![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Many of those being sold right now are improperly made, and cannot be calibrated accurately in pure water (when the intended use is in seawater):
See this thread: http://archive.reefcentral.com/forum...5&pagenumber=1
__________________
Randy Holmes-Farley |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Now I'm rattled. I just used the homemade mix to check my refractometer and I came up with 39ppt. With RO/DI checks at 0. Now I'm going to hed to LFS to check it there.
![]() ![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I just checked mine with the homemade mix and came up with ~39ppt as well. Readjusted it and of course my tank is coming out at 1.022 instead of .025.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Those results are, unfortunately, not unusual.
__________________
Randy Holmes-Farley |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for your very helpful posts, Randy.
After years of reading threads about how we should all ditch our hydrometers to buy refractometers, that's what I (and many others) did. And now this. Very, very disappointing. ![]()
__________________
Luck is probability taken personally. -C. Denman The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data'. Support Intelligunt Desine! I want to get a bunch of Hermit crabs and force them to live with each other. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
If my refractometer came with a "pure water" calibration fluid, then I should be OK with RODI right?
Ed
__________________
Driver carries no money...Owns a reef tank. Click the little red house to read my new 225 thread. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The problem is that a refractometer calibrated at zero, may be unaccurate at the higher, normal-use range. I believe the thread is only referring to one kind of refractometer, though.
__________________
Luck is probability taken personally. -C. Denman The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data'. Support Intelligunt Desine! I want to get a bunch of Hermit crabs and force them to live with each other. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
thanks for the heads up
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
its an easy standard to make and worth the piece of mind to be sure
__________________
looking for grammar check ------------------------------------------------ |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Hopefully I didn't have too much error from my mixing. I have a balance, but it is only accurate to 2g. So I weighed the water and salt to the masses you specified as best I could. I can't imagine there is more error to my way then there is to volumetric measuring.
What volume and mass did you use? +/- 2 g out of 73.1 grams of salt will potentially cause an error range of 1.0257 - 1.0271.
__________________
Randy Holmes-Farley |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Oh boy. Here we go again! There's been so many new people join though, I guess it was about time to remind everyone again. Randy, maybe it would be helpful if you posted the smaller gram weights that you can have a pharmacist mix up for you in a small bottle. That seems like a lot more accurate way to come up with a solution and what I calibrated mine to. My premium blue now drops the blue below the zero when reading pure RO/DI and I'm confident with it.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
I did the 2 litre bottle and tablesalt trick that Randy suggested and I discovered I had a problem with my refractometer. I didn't use and special instruments for supper accurate salt calculations or anything either. I think the point is more if you get something WAY off when doing this, then you know you have a refractometer that is incorrect. FWIW when I followed Randys recipie I came out with 1.026
I realized my refractometer was .09 off!! OUCH! |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Just call Randy's salt formula the new Heart Attack Special.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
You've done it now, haven't you? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Is there a standard amount the rhs10atc refractometers are out by? If there is then can you just make an adjustment for that amount it is out, without having to prepare any solution?
__________________
Preserve nature - pickle a squirrel |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Carole Melting! |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
I'm a little concerned about this only because I am testing the same with both a hydrometer and refractometer, both reading at 1.025, and distilled water at zero. I even tested my tap water with the refractometer knowing that it would be giving a salt reading of some sort, but not sure of what the content of my tap would normally read at. Tap water is on a water conditioner. I do have that same refractometer as stated. Does anyone know why the hydrometer would be giving the same reading????
![]()
__________________
Carole Melting! |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
so... after freaking out that my new refractometer read 1.038 and spending 4 days lowering the sg to 1.025-1.026 i may have lowered it too much? man... ok i need to find that recipe for calibration solution... Randy, care to repost it here?
__________________
Matt |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
what is the 2 liter bottle method
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
thanks..i actually just found that article.
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Randy saves the day again.
Thanks ![]()
__________________
One day I'll be so rich I'll have a closed loop and Tunzes to mix my new saltwater! |
|
|