|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Running Phosban Reactors in Sequence
I'm considering installing a second Phosban Reactor for running carbon or Purigen on my tank. I know quite a few people here have them daisy-chained together and I'm curious what arrangement seems to work best for people and any other considerations/advice you might have. Do you do
Phosban to Carbon or Carbon to PhosBan Also, those of you who do this, have you found better results running Carbon or Purigen in the reactors? Thanks. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I would go with phosban first, then the carbon.
__________________
"Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and he will spend all day in a boat drinking beer." |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I know a lot of people run carbon second to catch anything that the phosban may be leeching into the system
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I'm just running mine side by side.
__________________
Reefkeeper - (ref-ke-per) n: Individual obsessed with placing disturbing amounts of electricity and seawater in close proximity for the purpose of maintaining live coral reef organisms. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
I just picked up the reactor and got some advice from the LFS that made sense-- they recommended using spherical carbon in the first reactor with the valve wide open then run the PhosBan second in line with the valve backed off as usual. That way, the carbon can do an initial polishing then the PhosBan can do it's job on the remaining crap as well as adsorb any Phospate released by the carbon. It'll probably help extend the life of the GFO, too.
BTW, sharp looking setup, Coral 4 Bills. Or, in my case, Bills 4 Coral....lol. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Hey that will work, I'll try that Thanks.
__________________
Reefkeeper - (ref-ke-per) n: Individual obsessed with placing disturbing amounts of electricity and seawater in close proximity for the purpose of maintaining live coral reef organisms. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Phosban doesn't do anything to the "remaining crap" It is a binding agent, and phosphate binds to it. Nothing else.
__________________
"Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and he will spend all day in a boat drinking beer." |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Yeah, I can see how that logic makes sense, too. I picked up a container of SeaChem Matrix Spherical Carbon. I know there's great debate about the quality of different brands but it was the best stuff they had.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
you can also use both gfo and carbon in the same reactor...
__________________
~Jason |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
I was considering that but was told it's a big NO-NO. They have significantly different lifespans and mixing them reduces the efficacy of both.
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
"Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and he will spend all day in a boat drinking beer." |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Carbon first, then GFO. This will help eliminate anything that might gunk up the GFO and reduce its effectiveness. Yes, GFO is a binding substance, but if the surface of it is covered in crap it won't have as much surface contact with phosphate to bind.
__________________
Your tastebuds can't repel flavor of that magnitude! |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
That's the method/logic explained & recommended to me. Craig Lambert's idea to the opposite does make sense, too, but this makes more sense to me. Especially considering carbon has a generally shorter lifespan and is cheaper to replace more often.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
I use Seachem matrix as well. It's good stuff.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
http://archive.reefcentral.com/forum...+chart+results
__________________
"Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and he will spend all day in a boat drinking beer." |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
cool, thanks for the link. Glad to know I bought the good stuff.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
i daisy chain 2 phosban reactors in line. I put carbon first because people say that carbon can release phosphates so if it does its not going very far. Then phosban second...
__________________
Dan... I'm a closet reefer/ off road racer. |
|
|