|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
My 100G SPS dominated reef
Just thought I would share some pics with you (while I experiment with my new digital camera)
[IMG][/IMG] |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
[IMG][/IMG] [IMG][/IMG] [IMG][/IMG]
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
[IMG][/IMG]
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Nice!
__________________
ReefRockerLive's water chemistry: Is on the road to recovery! Everything looks nice though ;) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
[IMG][/IMG]
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
[IMG][/IMG]
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks ReefRockerLive !!!
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Very nice coloration. How bout some specs, equipments, husbandry, etc?
__________________
118g SPS/LPS semi-circle : 190 lbs LR, 30g ADHI Sump, Mag 9.5 return, Tunze 9010 skimmer, Phosban Reactor, 4 Tunze Nanostreams Modded, retros: 400w MH + 4x39w 36" T5 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks.
100 G display with 30 G sump Aqua C EV 120 skimmer Geo 618 calcium reactor Tunze osmolator automatic top up system with calcium dispenser (for Kalkwasser) Aqua Controller JR 4x Koralia 3 powerheads running on alternating timers (produce gyres in alternating directions) Pacific coast 1/4 hp chiller Lighting : 1x 400W aquaconnect 14.5 K MH powered by Ice Cap Electronic Ballast 1x 250W Aquaconnect 14.5 K MH powered by PFO HQI ballast 1x 250W Reeflux 12 K MH powered by PFO HQI ballast 2x 54W T5 Actinic plus |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Nice tank.
Is the Potter Angel safe with sps? I have been thinking to get one. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Hey man, beautiful tank.
I especially like the psychedelic goby, the gorgonians, clams, and selection of fish. Your sps corals look great, and healthy. Im just jumping into the sps, and only have small frags. The corals bases are finally growing over the sides of the plugs, hehe. Beautiful ! |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Very nice tank!
__________________
Click my Red House to check out my 120 in office reef (upgraded in Aug 06) Seeking therapy for my fish tank ADD |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Very nice! I like how you have varied SPS, and LPS. I also love the clam placements.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Is that Centropyge bicolor actually behaving itself in there? Very nice fish selection. Your tank has great colors in everything. Nice work!
Matthew |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
the bicolor is sweet, not a common fish for an sps tank.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks guys for your kind words.
Both the bicolor angel and the potter's angel are model citizens. They are peaceful, never bother any invertebrates or fish, and they voraciously eat flake food ! I also have a golden dwarf angel in there but he is a little camera shy. The interesting thing is that these little angels have defied everything I have read about them. They have been absolutely reef safe (so far) and despite being introduced one at a time many months apart, they behave as if they are not even aware that there are other angles in the same tank. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Everything looks very healthy and well fed, which is almost a rarity it seems nowadays
__________________
FSM ~ Touched by His noodly appendage ~ |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
I'd be on guard with the clam, but I love Centropyge & I think they often get a bum rap around RC at times..
Beautiful. Try to get a pic of the Golden sometime! Matthew |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
nice tank!
__________________
65g sps tank. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
very nice
__________________
Marine Aquarist Society of Barrie (MASB) Member, which is proudly supported by Aquariums Obsessed. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Great tank!
What digital camera do you have? Is it possible to reduce the film speed (iso number)? |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
I Have a canon A700, and yes you can control ISO. What would be the ideal ISO to take pictures of a tank?
thanks. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Lower ISO gets the cleanest picture, so ideally you would set it to the lowest value possible. In practice, you'll need a higher ISO to keep the shutter speed up to avoid motion blur. But, for every step up in ISO, you'll see a little more sensor noise in the image.
__________________
Beware the power of stupid people in large groups..... |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
[IMG][/IMG] [IMG][/IMG] [IMG][/IMG] [IMG][/IMG] [IMG][/IMG] [IMG][/IMG] [IMG][/IMG]
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
thanx jeffbrig ! the above pictures were taken with iso of 80...
|
|
|