|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
To UV or not to UV?
What is everyones take on UV sterizer's? What are the advantages or disadvantages?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Unless you have a really high-powered UV sterilizer with very very low water flow, I don't think they are much use.
JMHO, Carlos
__________________
Carlos RC Staff "Only a fool wants to hear the echo of his own voice." |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
IMO they dont have any place in a reef tank. FO systems, maybe, but in a reef they're just gonna kill off all the pods and other good stuff that you need for a reef tank.
__________________
Blake |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I bought one for my reef 2 years ago. I have used it maybe a total of 5 days if that. That was only because my hippo tang had ick.
__________________
Who would have thought that something so expensive could relax you so much. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Pros: They help break down organics in the water making it clearer and helping reduce algae.
Cons: They need a lot of maintenance and use electricity for the minor benefit they provide. They won't kill off all of your pods, bacteria, ich, or anything else that happens to be in the water. On recirculating systems, controlled tests have shown that their impacts on life in the water are essentially unmeasurable regardless of how big they are and how you run the water through.
__________________
Lanikai, kahakai nani, aloha no au ia 'oe. A hui hou kakou. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Myself, along with many others I know, swear by them for ich reduction in Reef tanks.
U can say this and that all you want, the proof is in the pudding |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Here's a list of a few articles that looked at the effectiveness of UV under controlled conditions on recirculating systems. They look at a variety of protozoans, bacteria, and fungal pathogens. In nearly all of them, pathogen mortality coming from the sterilizer was at or near 100% yet they all found that there was either no reduction in the overall population of pathogens in the tank or no reduction in infection rates vs. controls. The only reduction in infections seen can be attributed to acquired immunity and occurs with or without the sterilizer.
Spotte, S. and Adams, G. 1981. Pathogen Reduction in Closed Aquaculture Systems by UV Radiation: Fact or Artifact? MEPS 6: 295-298. Herald, E. S., Dempster, R. P, Hunt. M. 1970. Ultraviolet sterilization of aquarium water. In: Hayen, W. (ed.) Aquarium design criteria (Spec ed.), Drum and Croaker, U S Department of the Interior, Washington, DC. 57-71 Bullock. G. L.. Stuckey, H. M. 1977. Ultraviolet treatment of water for destruction of five gram-negative bacteria pathogenic to fishes. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 34: 1244-1249 Spotte, S., Buck, J. D. 1981. The efficacy of UV irradiation in the microbial disinfection of marine mammal water J. Wildl. Dis. 17: 11-16 Spanier, E. 1978. Preliminary trials with an ultraviolet liquid sterilizer. Aquaculture 14: 75-84 Gratzek, J.B., Gilbert, J.P., Lohr, A.L., Shotts, E.B. Jr., Brown, J. 1983. Ultraviolet light control of Ichthyophthirius multifiliis (Fouquet) in a closed fish culture recirculation system. J. Fish. Dis. 6:2 145-153.
__________________
Lanikai, kahakai nani, aloha no au ia 'oe. A hui hou kakou. Last edited by greenbean36191; 11/19/2007 at 05:52 PM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
-Chris |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Just because someone wrote it down and has a PHD in something doesn't always make it so.
When I said the proof is in the pudding, I meant that myself, along with many others, have found that despite what some guy who has some certification said, the UV steriliser was beneficial to the reduction of whitespot. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
So, what were your parameters when you tested the effects of ultraviolet radiation on Ich? What mortality rate did you observe? What equipment did you use to test? Your eyes? What variables were you able to eliminate as other possible causes of Ich reduction? None?
I've had FW tanks for years -- never observed Ich or had a fish die of Ich. Not once. Every single tank was a glass tank though, and not acrylic -- never used UV. Is it fair to swear by the use of glass vs. acrylic as a means of Ich control? Or, perhaps I can state that not using a UV sterilizer is beneficial to the reduction of Ich. See the issue here? Quote:
I hope it's clear that I'm not trying to start a flame war here.
__________________
-Chris Last edited by cd77; 11/19/2007 at 08:42 PM. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Science is not infallible, but to be published you need to get though extensive peer-review, to get funding in the first place, then go though extensive peer-review to get published and then your work is critiqued by everyone reading your article. Not to say you should believe everything you read, but if there is a flaw, plenty of peers (or competitors depending on how you look at it) will be there to point it out... In other words, UV has been under the microscope for some time, if there was a benifit to UV, someone would have published already.. |
|
|