Rowling: 'Help preserve the secrecy' of Potter

[hubris007]

Just saw this on cnn.com. Thought it seemed like a good idea.
I'm still angry that i saw three different articles yesterday that spoiled the fact that she actually does kill off Harry and Voldemort in the last book.


http://www.cnn.com/2007/SHOWBIZ/book....ap/index.html

[kfisc]

Bet you a whole bunch he resurfaces in about, oh, say eight to ten years, just about the time Rowling's investment portfolio needs another hit.

[amcarrig]

Oh, that's not right

[der_wille_zur_macht]

[amcarrig]

That is freakin hilarious! Where are you getting this stuff?!

[der_wille_zur_macht]

I could tell you, but then I'd have to . . . . . include your face in one of them.

[dc]

[der_wille_zur_macht]

[Sloth]

Originally posted by hubris007
Just saw this on cnn.com. Thought it seemed like a good idea.
I'm still angry that i saw three different articles yesterday that spoiled the fact that she actually does kill off Harry and Voldemort in the last book.

Aaaaaand now it's spoiled for me.

Or was that a joke?

[amcarrig]

Originally posted by der_wille_zur_macht

Biggles! Fetch...THE CUSHIONS!!

[aLittletank]

Originally posted by Sloth
Aaaaaand now it's spoiled for me.

Or was that a joke?

I second this...

Thanks for the big fat spoiler! I was planning on going to see the movie 1408 tonight, care to tell me the ending of that as well?

[Kensington]

Yup agreed....

I shouldnt have read this thread....

Grrrrrrr....

[Jeffrey Porter]

Originally posted by aLittletank
I second this...

Thanks for the big fat spoiler! I was planning on going to see the movie 1408 tonight, care to tell me the ending of that as well?

well in this movie you realise that he will have to die in the end. but most probably don't pay attention to the fact.

[MarkS]

Originally posted by Jeffrey Porter
well in this movie you realise that he will have to die in the end. but most probably don't pay attention to the fact.

No it doesn't. It says that for one to survive the other must die. In other words, just as in Highlander, "there can be only one."

[der_wille_zur_macht]

Originally posted by MarkS
No it doesn't. It says that for one to survive the other must die. In other words, just as in Highlander, "there can be only one."

(Disclaimer: Above statement is implied to exclude those frozen in ice, traveling through time, visiting from TV shows, or appearing out of nowhere even though they died in the first movie)

[MarkS]

Originally posted by der_wille_zur_macht
(Disclaimer: Above statement is implied to exclude those frozen in ice, traveling through time, visiting from TV shows, or appearing out of nowhere even though they died in the first movie)

[hubris007]

Originally posted by Sloth
Aaaaaand now it's spoiled for me.

Or was that a joke?

Heh. It was a joke. I'm trying to keep from knowing how it ends before i read it, too.

You know that's not going to happen, though. Threads like this one are an example. You think you're safe, then WHAMMO! Spoiled.

Don't you remember these t-shirts from the last book release?

[amcarrig]

[aLittletank]

Originally posted by hubris007
Heh. It was a joke.

well in that case... up your nose with a rubber hose!

[hubris007]

So, just finished the book last night. Man! I'd have never thought she would kill off the entire weasley clan. That's harsh.

[UH_OH_5_OH]

.......and what a horrible way to go too !!! Killed by a run away Farfnoffel !!!! Tragic I tell you ! Just Tragic !

[Nykademus]

Originally posted by hubris007
So, just finished the book last night. Man! I'd have never thought she would kill off the entire weasley clan. That's harsh.

pretty ruthless, I agree. I thought she could have at least left Ron or his dad.

[Scubadiva7]

oh sad. I am half way through and had no idea.. i had rumors but not like this. tear

[hubris007]

heh...



I did like the way dumbledore came back from the dead and killed snape.

[Fat Man]

Take it