Reef Central Online Community

Home Forum Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences View New Posts View Today's Posts

Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Search Reefkeeping ...an online magazine for marine aquarists Support our sponsors and mention Reef Central

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community Archives > Special Interest Group (SIG) Forums > Nano Reefs
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06/03/2006, 05:05 PM
won digity won digity is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Long beach, CA aka ghetto beach
Posts: 472
help me choose a fancy nano skimmer for me tank arggg....

what do you guys think about either this aquamedic unit from ebay:


"
The Biostar Flotor is a combination of a powerful motor driven protein skimmer with the Biorotor biological filter. It is designed for salt water aquariums up to 250 l (c. 65 gal). It is the smallest commercially manufactured complete filter system for salt water aquariums
....
With the Biostar Flotor the new trend in marine aquaria, the Microreef and Nanoreef aquariums can be successfully achieved. The skimming capacity of the system is large enough for dense stocking levels, even with fast growing SPS corals.
....
- protein skimmer with venturi pump (Ocean Runner PH 2000, 9 watts with Needle Wheel)

- Biorotor system creating exceptional biological capacity with enhanced oxygen uptake as the bacteria are alternately emersed and submersed.


http://cgi.ebay.com/AquaMedic-Biosta...ayphotohosting


or the tunze nano reefpack from marinedepot:


http://www.marinedepot.com/aquarium_...ic.asp?CartId=

I can't decide. Both companies have pretty good reputations, and my tank can handle either unit (intank or hob).
  #2  
Old 06/03/2006, 05:27 PM
bennerkla bennerkla is offline
Addicted Student
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 1,993
I've heard great things about the Tunze Nano Skimmer.
__________________
-Ben
  #3  
Old 06/03/2006, 05:40 PM
won digity won digity is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Long beach, CA aka ghetto beach
Posts: 472
really? I was trying to find info about them when they first kinda hit the market and all I can say is that info was scarce.

BTW this is going on my tank which holds about 15 gallons of water. Tanks is littered with SPS frags wich have been doing good so far without a skimmer for 2-3 months.
  #4  
Old 06/03/2006, 06:47 PM
DarkXerox DarkXerox is offline
Pappone Nerd
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Claremont & Oakland, CA
Posts: 978
go with the Tunze, I've seen it used on a few tanks and it is really quiet, yet pulls out a fair amount
  #5  
Old 06/03/2006, 07:00 PM
oldreefer76 oldreefer76 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Elyria, Oh
Posts: 1,001
Tunze for sure am saving my $ to upgrade to it
  #6  
Old 06/03/2006, 09:26 PM
skipm skipm is offline
Hermit with Featherduster
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: St. Helena Is. SC
Posts: 2,152
The pic you have shows the Tunze skimmer and nano filter, the skimmer itself is only half as wide. Just to throw a monkey wrench in the works I thought I woulod also point out that the new Nano-Remora from AquaC is going to be available anytime now from MarineDepot, according to AquaC they have already been shipped to them and should be on the website any time now.
__________________
Caretaker of fishtanks and a spoiled labrador retreiver.
  #7  
Old 06/03/2006, 09:30 PM
Sebea Sebea is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Orlando
Posts: 144
Yes, the nano remora is coming out, but it is the same price as the regular remora. The only difference is the height (the nano is to accomodate shorter tanks) IMO, go with the tunze or a remora.
  #8  
Old 06/03/2006, 09:55 PM
ClarkiiClown ClarkiiClown is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 99
TUNZE- how can you go wrong?
__________________
"Do you know who this is??"
"NO, Who is this is?"
  #9  
Old 06/03/2006, 11:57 PM
groovemcfly groovemcfly is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 161
Anyone use the tunze nano skimmer? How is it?
  #10  
Old 06/04/2006, 12:34 AM
Nathan4Wvu Nathan4Wvu is offline
Burning Down the Couch!
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Home:Charleston, West Virginia/Motown WVU
Posts: 1,199
I would go with the Tunze there stuff is always top of the line!!!



BTW hey VT who got the last laugh last football season your poor qb really got what he deserved lol and two words Flordia State lol
__________________
Let Go Mountaineers!!!!!

There is no such thing as global warming. Chuck Norris was cold, so he turned the sun up!!!!!!

Here we go STEELERS here we go!
  #11  
Old 06/04/2006, 02:47 PM
slipper slipper is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Bristol,Tn
Posts: 23
Hi folks this is auntievan I'm on slippers pc. I purchased the tunze nano due to the fact I've always figured they are one of the best....but....after initial use and even getting advise for a bit of a mod to help it along I am disapointed. I pulled it off the tank and went with a coralife 65. I really feel I totally waisted my 135 bucks.
Mary K.
  #12  
Old 06/04/2006, 03:12 PM
bennerkla bennerkla is offline
Addicted Student
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 1,993
I'm not a Marcus Vick fan. I'm going there next year, and I'm very glad Tech kicked him out. What a pathetic young man.

Hey, at least we won our bowl game!
__________________
-Ben
  #13  
Old 06/04/2006, 04:48 PM
won digity won digity is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Long beach, CA aka ghetto beach
Posts: 472
Quote:
Originally posted by slipper
Hi folks this is auntievan I'm on slippers pc. I purchased the tunze nano due to the fact I've always figured they are one of the best....but....after initial use and even getting advise for a bit of a mod to help it along I am disapointed. I pulled it off the tank and went with a coralife 65. I really feel I totally waisted my 135 bucks.
Mary K.
hmmm. Is it because it is just too small of a reaction chamber to be an efficient skimmer?
  #14  
Old 06/04/2006, 05:29 PM
auntievan auntievan is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bristol TN
Posts: 71
Won digity, I have absolutely no idea. Now that you mention it that...and the need of possibly a more powerful pump. All I know is I really wanted it to work.
Mary K.
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef Central™ Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2009