Reef Central Online Community

Home Forum Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences View New Posts View Today's Posts

Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Search Reefkeeping ...an online magazine for marine aquarists Support our sponsors and mention Reef Central

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community Archives > Special Interest Group (SIG) Forums > Large Reef Tanks
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03/29/2006, 06:48 PM
ab5ebdxer ab5ebdxer is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canyon Lake, Texas
Posts: 1,044
750g circulation

We are getting ready to put together the circulation system for a 750g tank that finally arrived. I am wondering what kind of gph flow you guys think is good and what is the best way to accomplish this task. I was thinking around 25,000gph with a extensive closed loop system.

Thanks

Mike
  #2  
Old 03/29/2006, 06:52 PM
Nanook Nanook is offline
Ancient Eskimo Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: South County
Posts: 10,527
What kind of reef tank is this going to be? Depending on the corals you are keeping, the answers can vary widely.

Nook
__________________
Dave

"The wind blew, the detritus flew and then they came two by two."
  #3  
Old 03/29/2006, 07:07 PM
ab5ebdxer ab5ebdxer is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canyon Lake, Texas
Posts: 1,044
Nook,

I think the answers will vary widely no matter what but we will have some sps in some areas but hope to have a variety of corals. I realize it might not be a easy question to answer. We will have some areas of lower lighting that should be good for sps etc.

Mike
  #4  
Old 03/29/2006, 09:01 PM
Nanook Nanook is offline
Ancient Eskimo Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: South County
Posts: 10,527
Gotcha! The other question I neglected to ask was pertaining to the dimensions of your tank.

Over 30X tank turnover is a nice figure, now the trick is how to do it without blowing the flesh off of certain corals, blowing the sandbed around and hitting all the dead spots

I think a combination of the closed loop you mention and perhaps some powerheads, ie: The new vortechs, Tunze Streams and Turbelles, Ocean Motions 4-8way (which I do not know much about), or other wavemaking devices to mix it up. Random flow is desirable, keeping in mind that the more varied the flow is, the better your tank will look down the road.
__________________
Dave

"The wind blew, the detritus flew and then they came two by two."
  #5  
Old 03/30/2006, 12:13 PM
ricks ricks is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: portland,or
Posts: 565
With that kind of heat, I'd look for about a 2HP chiller.. I run a 1 HP on my 500 with about 12,000 of flow...
  #6  
Old 03/30/2006, 12:26 PM
ab5ebdxer ab5ebdxer is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canyon Lake, Texas
Posts: 1,044
Nook,

The tank is 5ft by 8ft by 30in. We are planning on building a support structure for the live rock which will also have closed loops returning water through the rock. I have been using www.oregonreef.com as an outline for this project and I like the way he did his flow and rock. We are planning on three closed loops that will each have several outlets. We will be able to direct each outlet.

Ricks,

We have not considered our needs for a chiller yet. We really want to put the lights on and see where it settles out. I am sure we will need one though.

Thanks for the input guys.

Mike
  #7  
Old 03/30/2006, 01:16 PM
pondfrog pondfrog is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: IL
Posts: 651
I'll jump in and vote for the obvious--- ditch the closed loop and get the Tunze system. I really don't understand the fascination with closed loops- I had a closed loop on my 300 and it wasn't all that great----you can't change it (easily anyway) and the flow coming out of the "exhuast" is a small spot flow no matter how many outlets you have on it.

Going with a wavebox and stream combo would seem to be a better option (It's the way I"m going on my upgrade) I currently run a WB/stream combo on my 300 sump and love it.
In a tank as large as yours the WB and the stream will disappear and/or can be covered.
  #8  
Old 03/30/2006, 02:03 PM
Buk_A_neer Buk_A_neer is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Calgary
Posts: 97
I had 2 cloed loops on my old 330G system and it worked quite well in conjunction with 4 eductors

If you are familiar with eductors they basically take 1 gph input and put out 4 to 5 gph output ( with a pressure rated pump )

this can significantly increase your flow with a minimum of cost in comparison to buying overpriced powerheads ( sorry but I dont like stuff hanging on the inside of my tanks AND have to pay big bucks for it )

A good example of how much flow you can achieve with a closed loop and a eductor is using a mak5 or ( Iwaki 70 ) rated at approx 1500 gph ... with only one eductor you would incrase flow from that pump up to potentially 7500 gph ... with that size pump you can actually run 2 eductors pushing approximately 50% more flow so closer to 10000 gph ... using a wave device of your choice you could plumb 4 outputs for each closed loop on each end of the tank for a more varied flow

OH ... and another thing ... the output of a eductor is not a " spot flow " as has previously been mentioned ... but gives a " Tunzee like " wide dispersion over a large area

So a couple closed loops and you can see how much flow can be attained for a fraction of the cost of those high end powerheads

Here is a link to a flow chart based on pump specs to output

http://www.kthsales.com/website/Misc...ow%20rates.pdf

this company has what they call " penductors " which is what I used on my old tank and what I plan to use on my new tank and they are smaller and less obtrusive in a reeftank environment

PS ... nice to see that I am not the only loon that thought 330G was too small ... I have the glass ordered for my 638G ( 96X48X32 ) and it gets delivered on Sunday
  #9  
Old 03/30/2006, 02:05 PM
shaw shaw is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 691
well, i would think a closed loop hooked to oceanmotions, or actuated ball valve would help considerably.
__________________
Have you thanked your Diatoms Today!
  #10  
Old 03/30/2006, 02:14 PM
pondfrog pondfrog is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: IL
Posts: 651
Quote:
Originally posted by Buk_A_neer

PS ... nice to see that I am not the only loon that thought 330G was too small ... I have the glass ordered for my 638G ( 96X48X32 ) and it gets delivered on Sunday


Yes, I feel sorry for those folks who are "upgrading" from a 75 to a 200 and say this is the "big one"............there is always bigger-- give it a year or so!!! hmmmm, I guess that's true even for me now.................. doggone it!

While your point on eductors is a good one, I have seen enough waveboxes now to really like the effect--- it really is like you are diving the way things sway.
And the streams can change position in the long run....while with a closed loop you are going to be pretty stuck with it setup as it is initially. As the tank inhabitants grow and change the flexibility may be nice.
But definately a much less expensive way to acheive a similar goal! If I ever did a CL again, I would use the penductors.
  #11  
Old 03/30/2006, 09:10 PM
Buk_A_neer Buk_A_neer is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Calgary
Posts: 97
I imagine to have some of the penductors static but see if I can get locline to be able to direct the flow where I want it on some of the returns ... I have never used locline before so not sure if that would work
  #12  
Old 03/30/2006, 10:11 PM
Stephany Stephany is offline
Shh... We're fishing.
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Buffalo as of 8/1
Posts: 1,163
TippyToex posted an old thread started by "Bomber" saying that they were dangerous. I didn't read the whole thing, but as the discussion proceeded... that didn't seem to be the case.

I tried messaging her, but she's not accepting private messages.
I think the oceans motions idea is great though... if we could get it donated.
  #13  
Old 03/30/2006, 10:36 PM
Buk_A_neer Buk_A_neer is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Calgary
Posts: 97
locline or penductors ?

I have been running penductors for years now with no issues
  #14  
Old 04/06/2006, 01:58 PM
Stephany Stephany is offline
Shh... We're fishing.
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Buffalo as of 8/1
Posts: 1,163
Looks like if we do use penductors we will not be able to use a sea swirl. ... if that's in budget anyway.

http://www.kthsales.com/website/Misc...nthusiasts.htm
  #15  
Old 04/06/2006, 08:36 PM
alien9168 alien9168 is offline
Architecture Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: "Does it seem like were walking uphill" "a rubix cube"
Posts: 1,659
Tagging.
__________________
-Alien
  #16  
Old 04/06/2006, 09:28 PM
Scuba_Dave Scuba_Dave is offline
LIGHTS ARE ON!!!!
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Asylum, South of Boston, MA
Posts: 10,282
alien9168

if you look at the botton of each thread you will see a button that says

"Subscribe to this thread"

Located:
Below "Post reply" is "quick reply", below that and to the right is the "Submit post" button
Below THAT & to the right is
"Subscribe to this thread"

No need to make a meaningless post
Many people miss this
Hope that helps
  #17  
Old 04/08/2006, 11:38 AM
alien9168 alien9168 is offline
Architecture Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: "Does it seem like were walking uphill" "a rubix cube"
Posts: 1,659
Quote:
Originally posted by Scuba_Dave
alien9168

if you look at the botton of each thread you will see a button that says

"Subscribe to this thread"

Located:
Below "Post reply" is "quick reply", below that and to the right is the "Submit post" button
Below THAT & to the right is
"Subscribe to this thread"

No need to make a meaningless post
Many people miss this
Hope that helps
I know how to subscribe to the thread...

Alot of people think that simply saying "tagging" is meaningless.

Let me explain my logic.

#1 If I post, tagging, I announce myself to the threads creator...I will inevitably post more.

#2 By tagging, my acount automatically subscribes to this thread

#3 It expresses my intrest in the topic of disgussion to the creator of the thread and all that view it.

I dont mean to make meaningless posts.... sorry if your took it that way.
__________________
-Alien
  #18  
Old 04/09/2006, 05:11 PM
Stephany Stephany is offline
Shh... We're fishing.
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Buffalo as of 8/1
Posts: 1,163
Anyone have any further experiences with the use of penductors, good or bad?
  #19  
Old 04/09/2006, 07:18 PM
MickyB MickyB is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: MA
Posts: 332
ab5ebdxer,

Like the size of your tank. Is it going to be in the basement on concrete floor? Have the same size 3/4" acrylic and have 4 Tunze 6100's no closed loops and an Ampmaster 5800 (i think
)pump for a return from a 300 gallon sump. The tank is softies and alot of Fish. The sump is full of live rock. Have alot of open space in the front 3 ft of the tank for the fish to swim. The only thing that i get is the red cyano growing in a few places , think it's caused by old MH bulbs and not enough flow. Had 6 250W MH over it and the 1HP chiller keep it at 79 in the summer with no problem.
  #20  
Old 04/10/2006, 12:38 PM
Stephany Stephany is offline
Shh... We're fishing.
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Buffalo as of 8/1
Posts: 1,163
It is going on a wooden stand...

So 4 Tunze 6100's & an ampmaster 5800 is not enough flow. Gotcha, I think that we were going for more flow...

Each Tunze 6100 is rated for 3175 gallons per hour x 4 = 12700gph.
+
Is it a "Dolphin Super Ampmaster 5600?" The only thing I'm coming up for 5800 is the "Sequence 5800".
Anyway 5800 gph... are you happy with that pump?

12700 + 5800 = 18500 gph. Would you think this to be accurate?
I don't think we're worrying about the heat factor yet.
  #21  
Old 04/10/2006, 03:33 PM
moriartiholmes moriartiholmes is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Buffalo N.Y.
Posts: 818
I'm not sure what the tank will look like when it's done but I was thinking about energy/set up cost efficiency on a large tank and I thought of a series of surge buckets. You could make a stand for a bunch of 5-gallon buckets (as many as you can fit would be great. If you can find taller buckets even better. Then inside the buckets, you could use a simple siphon surge device or a Borneman flush devise for a little more money. The surge devices could be run on MJ 1200 which only push 300 GPH but through the surge device, the 300 GPH will be sent randomly and in strong spurts, which should benefit the livestock.
If you want stronger surges, you could use stronger feed pumps in larger containers, say a MAG 9.5 and a garbage can.
I would also add a closed loop or something more traditional for good circulation.
Like I said, I don't really know what the set up looks like, and I was thinking what would be more economical. In reality you'll probably just have to work with whatever you are donated

So who will be responsible for maintenance once the tank is complete? Just asking because that seems like it could cause a problem.
__________________
Brian
  #22  
Old 04/10/2006, 04:21 PM
dalbrecht dalbrecht is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 538
I agree with moriarti holmes, except I would encourage you to look at the potential of using a roughneck or two.

Another option would be some type of piston wave maker, dump bucket or surge device. I would just recomomend a larger single surge device built off of a garbage can rather than multiple smaller devices. It would be simpler & more dramatic.
  #23  
Old 04/10/2006, 04:44 PM
Buk_A_neer Buk_A_neer is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Calgary
Posts: 97
The problem with large volume surge devices is that they play havoc with top off systems ... not impossible to deal with but certainly more of a challenge as well as potential water on the floor
  #24  
Old 04/10/2006, 05:13 PM
enamdjd enamdjd is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New York City
Posts: 61
I would add Tunze 6200's and hide in the rock work. They are efficient and quite powerful.
__________________
Keeping fish and exploring its scientific basis as a child influenced me to pursue medicine and environmental law. Whoever said reefing was just a hobby?
  #25  
Old 04/10/2006, 05:44 PM
Buk_A_neer Buk_A_neer is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Calgary
Posts: 97
The thing I have considered is the cost

Tunzee's are very expensive up front cost

three penductors ( $75.00 ) with a PanworldMD70R ( 1750 gph ) ( $250.00 ) would generate over 2600 gph ( $ 325.00 )

that would equal 5 Tunzee 6200's @ $450.00 each = $ 2250.00

now the Panworld uses 290 watts

the Tunzee's use 62W each or 310W total

If the stats on the Penductors are accurate for that pump ( pretty sure they are )

but even if you run only 2 Penductors/Panworld that is 17,500 gph ( $ 300.00 ) or 3 Tunzee 6200's 15849 gph ( $ 1350.00 )

Plumbing costs would vary for the closed loops depending on your DIY skills ( diamond bits 5 - 6 dollars on ebay, bulkheads 10 - 15 dollars each And tubing ball valves etc 20 to 30 dollars = 50 - 70 dollars or so )

The electricity savings in the latter example would be 104 watts in favour of the Tunzee's

I am posting this to get some constructive criticsm because it is the " Ben Franklin " that I have done in deciding to setup my tank that I am building

Question to all out there ... what is the lowest wattage High Pressure pump that you know of ? ... so far the Iwaki lookalike ( Panworld http://www.premiumaquatics.com/Merch..._Code=Panworld ) are the best priced that I have found so far
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef Central™ Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2009