|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
1280 X 768 here
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
1440x900
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
1600x1200
Native resolution for my 21" dell flat panel |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
1600x1200
__________________
AGA 210g. Aquactinic Constellation and Lifereef custom sump/fuge 65g and skimmer Anthias junky,keeping:dispars,carberryi,bartelettorum,evansi,squamipinnis,tuka, pulcherrimus, paravirostris |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
1280 x 1024 - which works well for me.
And yet I'm constantly amazed when people post pictures that are 2200 pixels wide, causing the discussion to scroll off screen. That would be a triple scroll for those at 800 x 600 resolution!
__________________
Marc Levenson - member of DFWMAS |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
It is generally accepted that the highest common screen resolution to design a web site for is 1024 x 768. This is the lowest resolution supported by most modern computers. 800 x 600 used to be that standard but not anymore.
My screen resolution is 4480 x 1600 |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
1024x768 (on a 42" LCD screen)
__________________
Genius is 1 percent inspiration and 99% perspiration, which is why engineers sometimes smell really bad. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
1680x1050
__________________
58g oceanic (36x18x21) 36" Aquatinics 2x175w MH 2x39w T5 Deltec MCE600 3x Koralia 3's Litermeter3 Dual stage Ranco controller Matt |
|
|