|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Tank and all personal property is covered, animals, corals an inhabitants are not. If the tank cause structural damage, that is covered as well, minus your deductible. There is also Replacement cost coverage, make sure you have that or your property will be depreciated. Hope that helps.
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
another state farm employee here. cheers!
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
say your tank did break and caused 2000 in damage, would it be worth submitting a claim? i would think your insurance would go up and i also heard that once you have a couple claims in it makes it that much harder to get insurance, is this true?
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
For me, I would likely pay for $2,000 in damage privately as I know my insurance premium increases for any homeowners claims. |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
"If the fish tank broke and flooded your living room, the carpet, walls, and structure of the house would be covered. But the tank, its inhabitants or a couch, TV, or computer sitting next to the tank would NOT be covered." That's a very big discrepancy in coverage, so I hope I was told the wrong thing. Who do I believe?! |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
i claimed a broken pipe that ruined a lot of our basement last year and our premium didn't go up...
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
seapug, your claims rep may have been confused by your question, or just didn't know (which happens a lot.) if your tank went crazy and spilled and ruined your TV. by SF standards it is no different if you kitchen sink exploded and ruined your TV. and since Personal property is covered under your homeowners policy, it would be covered minus your deductible. the adjuster may have been thinking that a broken tank was along the same lines as a sewer back up, which is only covered on a policy if there was a riders to the policy added.
xxxbadfishxxx. that is exactly what insurance is for. huge losses. if your ded is 500. then you pay the first 500 and your ins pays everything after that. and to them it doesn't matter if they pay 5000 or 500000. a loss is a loss and they increase your rates on the amount of losses you have. not for how much the loss was for. so if you put in 5 claims for 2000 to 3000 grand each. your rates will be much more then if you had one huge loss for 200,000. and when you do have a loss, other ins companies will know and if you get cancelled other companies might not take your business. and your premium wont necessarily go up with one claim. you would have to talk to your agent about that. so only use your insurance if you have a huge problem that you cant pay for.
__________________
Guns don't kill people, Chuck Norris kills people. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
okay, thanks for the info, Lordhelmet!
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
My deductable is $500. I've already paid the insurance for the year, I'd use it as opposed to paying $1500 out of my own pocket, even if I had the $1500. Hopefully I'll never have to find out. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Anything in the $3,000 range and up I would likely make a claim, that's for me based on how much I understand my rates would go up. I hold the opinion where I don't make claims for everything my insurance covers because I am also playing the opposite game of the insurance company, hedging my bets on long term premium payments and trying to minimize my total investment. Even with this opinion though, I do not consider homeowners insurance to only be for catastrophic damages. When and how to use it depends on your own budget. You can always, at least with my insurance company, talk to them about the amount of a claim and how much it will increase the premium. My parents had a battery dropped on their laminate floor and they decided to go through homeowners insurance. My father is getting older and doesn't do many home projects anymore and a yearly premium increase made more sense financially than paying out of pocket several thousand dollars. It really is an individual decision based on your specific factors. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Brody: It doesn't make any sense when you pay a guy like you to watch sharks. Hooper: Well, uh, it doesn't make much sense for a guy who hates the water to live on an island either. Brody: It's only an island if you look at it from the water. Hooper: That makes a lot of sense. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
There is a loophole that many arent aware of. Check your policies for coverage on plumbing fixtures. As it turns out, if you plumb your RO to the tank directly in some manner (even if its on a valve that is manually closed most of the time), like to fill the ATO bucket, or to directly fill the tank, that 1/4" waterline makes your tank, and everything in it except the livestock, a 'plumbed fixture', like a Fridge with an icemaker... and then it is covered.
A few years back, someone here had the bottom panel on their 180g crack and flood everything. The agent at first claimed the tank and other equipment under the tank that was damaged wasnt covered... but then he saw it was plumbed in to the house's water via the RO.... everything but the corals/fish were covered. As for covering livestock... its not worth it. Its best to 'self insure' unless you are large enough, like a fish store, to need a backup in the event of some mammoth equipment failure that whipes out your whole system.
__________________
"If at first, the idea is not absurd, then there is no hope for it" -Al Einstein |
|
|