Reef Central Online Community

Home Forum Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences View New Posts View Today's Posts

Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Search Reefkeeping ...an online magazine for marine aquarists Support our sponsors and mention Reef Central

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community Archives > General Interest Forums > Advanced Topics

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01/01/2008, 11:30 PM
tonyespinoza tonyespinoza is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: california
Posts: 208
Dark Live Rock (DLR?) Filter?

I'm thinking for my next tank that I may go for more of a prop tank setup where I put all my Live Rock in a completely dark sump. The display will be quite shallow (12" water) and have only dead base rock. Of course the system would also have a monster skimmer, Ca Reactor, RDSB (> 12" deep), 20% 'fuge, etc.

Thoughts? Anyone have experience with a completely Dark Live Rock (DLR) filter? I assume it would have most of the benefits and support a lot of beneficial organisms.

I'm fascinated with the Tyree TriZonal Crytpic systems but don't have the balls to go there yet...
  #2  
Old 01/01/2008, 11:32 PM
rppvt rppvt is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 425
I have a pair of Fluvals loaded with rubble live rock--- they are almost wall to wall sponges in there I'm not sure if this is indeed better than anything, but I also have chaeto in the refuge part of the sump--- so I can't vouch for too much--- I do know it's loaded with critters
  #3  
Old 01/01/2008, 11:35 PM
tonyespinoza tonyespinoza is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: california
Posts: 208
Do you worry at all that without denser rock with anerobic areas that it might become a nitrate factory? Or do you have a DSB?
  #4  
Old 01/02/2008, 10:37 AM
greenbean36191 greenbean36191 is offline
Soul of a Sailor
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Huntsville/ Auburn, AL
Posts: 7,859
There's no reason why LR in the dark should work any better than LR in the light. In theory at least, it would be slightly worse, though the difference would probably be insignificant.
__________________
Lanikai, kahakai nani, aloha no au ia 'oe. A hui hou kakou.
  #5  
Old 01/02/2008, 04:00 PM
tonyespinoza tonyespinoza is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: california
Posts: 208
I wouldn't expect it to be "better" than live rock in light -- except that you don't have to deal with nearly the density of pest issues (hydroids, bristle worms (which in and of themselves are fine until they start messing with your corals and clams), UFO turf algae (which a few of us have and no snail will eat), etc.) You'd also have a little more overhead in dealing with the display pieces (adding, moving, or removing) without disturbing the core biological filtration system.
  #6  
Old 01/02/2008, 10:27 PM
Agu Agu is offline
RC Mod
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Venice, Florida
Posts: 15,230
It's called a "cryptic zone", as promoted by Steve Tyree . The concept is that sponges, tunicates, and other life forms that don't thrive in our highly lighted tanks can grow and purify the water.

Here's a link to his website, DE Publishing

A search for cryptic zone brings up a lot of information. I've read the book and tried it on a limited basis. As an addition to typical techniques it works imo. The number of pods and tubeworms in my marginal cryptic zone alone justifies it.
__________________
Less technology , more biology .
  #7  
Old 01/02/2008, 11:21 PM
greenbean36191 greenbean36191 is offline
Soul of a Sailor
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Huntsville/ Auburn, AL
Posts: 7,859
I've read Tyree's writing on the method and was thoroughly underwhelmed with it. There's not much good science behind it.
__________________
Lanikai, kahakai nani, aloha no au ia 'oe. A hui hou kakou.
  #8  
Old 01/02/2008, 11:47 PM
Agu Agu is offline
RC Mod
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Venice, Florida
Posts: 15,230
Can't disagree with you. His tanks were holding tanks for imported corals. There was a constant influx of new organisms that skewed his findings. As you may have noticed I used the term "promoted".

Doesn't negate my observation that a low flow area with minimal lighting appears to enhance the growth of organisms that aren't prevalent in the display tank.
__________________
Less technology , more biology .
  #9  
Old 01/03/2008, 10:45 AM
tonyespinoza tonyespinoza is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: california
Posts: 208
Yup - read the cryptic zone stuff. I'm fascinated with the concept and want to give it a try. It just make intuitive sense to me. Thanks guys.
  #10  
Old 01/03/2008, 04:33 PM
greenbean36191 greenbean36191 is offline
Soul of a Sailor
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Huntsville/ Auburn, AL
Posts: 7,859
Quote:
Doesn't negate my observation that a low flow area with minimal lighting appears to enhance the growth of organisms that aren't prevalent in the display tank.
I certainly can't argue with that.

What I do take issue with though are his claims about the roles of sponges and tunicates that contradict the primary literature and common sense. Plus the way he tries to present it as real scientific work and misuses terminology really annoyed me, but that's a style issue more than content.
__________________
Lanikai, kahakai nani, aloha no au ia 'oe. A hui hou kakou.
  #11  
Old 01/03/2008, 06:36 PM
tonyespinoza tonyespinoza is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: california
Posts: 208
i guess i'd rather follow the thinking of someone who's done this all for years (rather successfully!) as opposed to someone who articulates the literature correctly and eloquently and hasn't really spent much time actually growing corals on their own.
  #12  
Old 01/04/2008, 10:35 AM
dendro982 dendro982 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,877
I tried for a short term - few months, may be. As a sump with biomedia (LR) and skimmer for non-photosynthetic nano-tank. Less problems with flat worms and red cyano, and less shedding from the rock. Like it much better.

One thing to pay attention: I had the rock for a coupe of months in it's own heated, circulating container, no feeding or dirty water from the main tank, still significant level of phosphates and nitrates in its water. The thing to be done before - seems, it's called to cook the rock - keep in the dark with water changes and removing shed detritus.
  #13  
Old 01/04/2008, 01:19 PM
tonyespinoza tonyespinoza is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: california
Posts: 208
yup - i think cooking the rock is key. but i've found that even if you do, the rock will eventually shed and such and this gets old in a bare bottom...
  #14  
Old 01/04/2008, 05:11 PM
idareefer idareefer is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: idaho falls, idaho
Posts: 79
a darkend area will work great, when I redid my system I put in some of my live rock I had from my my old system & put into my make up( trash can) 55gal of RO salt water and with 2 power heads, covered it and left it for over 3 months running until I got my system up going again, put in new sand, dead rock, approx 200 # then mixed back in my old rock and my tank really never went through a cycle, I kept waiting but it never happened, so I just started adding corals like 3 weeks later and fish, coraline started growing within like 2 weeks, and sponges started reapearing and all the little feather duster worms reawakened, even some zoa's popped up from some of the rocks, go for it! you will be just fine, they need hardly any light or indirect light, just look at everyones sumps & fuges, with hardly no light, full of coraline and tunicats, like Tyree is doing, we just make things to complicated, it's just way to simple.
  #15  
Old 01/04/2008, 09:19 PM
tonyespinoza tonyespinoza is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: california
Posts: 208
awesome - thanks for sharing your experience and for the encouragement too!

-tE
  #16  
Old 01/05/2008, 09:44 AM
dendro982 dendro982 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,877
Quote:
Originally posted by tonyespinoza
...even if you do, the rock will eventually shed...
But significantly less You will lose coraline too.

For a months I'm using the artificial ceramic media - Seachem Matrix biomedia (Pond Matrix is bigger, DeNitrate - smaller) in canister filter and in the sump. No shedding, fine ceramic cylinders should do the same, unlike the coarse AquaClear power filters ceramic cylinders.

I'm keeping it as a biological filter in canister filter, and in sump - for denitrification (pile in low flow area).
  #17  
Old 01/05/2008, 11:10 AM
tonyespinoza tonyespinoza is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: california
Posts: 208
i worry about media like that not having the density to support anaerobic activity and thereby serving as a "nitrate factory".

not worried if the dark rock does not have coralline.

i will have base rock in the main display that will develop coralline and also denitrifying bacteria. but the difference is that the concentration of organisms in the display will be skewed towards my SPS as opposed to the live rock organisms (which will predominately reside in the dark sump). there will also be a reverse daylight sump with rock (equivalent size to the dark sump) and a 24hr fuge too.
  #18  
Old 01/05/2008, 02:07 PM
bergzy bergzy is offline
Brother Maynard
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The OC, Baby!!!
Posts: 4,082
funny.

i just posted my thread on discussion:http://archive.reefcentral.com/forum...readid=1286582

steve tyree write up:
http://www.practicalfishkeeping.co.u...article_id=544

my (dark rock) cryptic zone 'filter':



differences in my sps display? better coloration, better polyp extension, noticeable increased growth. there could be other factors as well, but so far, i have not noticed any detrimental effects...yet. is it too early to make a definitive judgment? yes. will there ever be a long enough time frame to satisfy reefers impossible need for justification? nope.
__________________
...and the people did feast upon the lambs and sloths and carp and anchovies and orangutans and breakfast cereals, and fruit bats and...

Ben.
  #19  
Old 01/05/2008, 04:51 PM
tonyespinoza tonyespinoza is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: california
Posts: 208
cool! i just subscribed!
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef Central™ Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2009