|
#201
|
|||
|
|||
Well...all I can say is that I have been observing something different. I just can not believe that any life that may be eaten in the top layer is not present below.
Like I said...MY experience leads me to believe that this and a lot of other dogmatic, knee jerk advice is not always the case. It may be do to the fact that MY Goby is the only bottom feeder in a 125 gal tank. It may also be the fact that he eats like a pig when I feed the tank. Now maybe in a different situation your opinion would ring truer. Say a smaller, lighter fed, less established tank. Way to often I see one "size fits all" advice given while forgetting that not all tanks behave alike. I know that there are some basic practices that MOST tank need to adhere to but...this is not one of them.
__________________
Current Livestock: mated pair False Percs mated pair Banggai Cardinals Longnose Hawkfish Magnificent Rabbitfish Diamond Goby Blond Naso Tang Bluechin Trigger I got the poo on me. |
#202
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Most fish will even live for months with no food. The true worth of a tank is longivity measured in years or tens of years. If your fish are not living at least ten years and your corals are not growing and or reproducing you are failing at this endeavor. I do not say this lightly. For years my tank thrived and looked (to me anyway) beautiful. I am having some problems now which means I am failing. But failing in this hobby anyway could be considered a good thing because we learn the most when we fail. Don't get me wrong, my tank is still thriving and the fish are all healthy and breeding but the corals suffered a set back. (I diden't find out why yet) I don't take this as a setback, I find it interesting and since my tank is an experiment, anything that happens either good or bad is a rewarding experience that excites me. I have no way to judge my tank because I know of no older tanks. Maybe something happens to bacteria after so many years or maybe "Old Tank Syndrome kicks in after three decades (A few months ago) |
#203
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for posting Paul B. Your tank is amazing both in it's longevity and simplicity. Sorry to hear you had a setback....hadn't heard about that.
You get the award for most "rules" broken and still successful as far as I'm concerned Chris
__________________
"Try to learn something about everything and everything about something" -- Thomas H. Huxley |
#204
|
|||
|
|||
I think the exception is nematodes. Their repro rate in the wilds is very low. The same for their survival rate in most peoples tanks for most varieties. Harvesting has a very noticeable impact on them. Oh and live rock might the other area, but in general i agree with this statement. recently i was snokeling on the most amazing reef in about 3 - 5 feet of water in southern MX. large fan corals swaying in water you could stand up in. Care had to be take or you would be thrown into the rock by the waves. Now it was off the beaten path but even so, as my brother and I sat on beach taking a break we watched some people from a boat stand up and WALK across this reef about 50 yards offshore. The amount of destruction from that is unimaginable. Certsainly causing more destruction than a large amount of collecting would.
Quote:
__________________
When in doubt ride a bike. |
#205
|
|||
|
|||
good read--thanks!!
|
#206
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The thing is, exploration of reefs and reefkeeping itself is quite new and you dont really see the expenditures and media boost around it like you would say NASA and space exploration. I spend several hours a week reading papers on my main interest (harpacticoid copepods) and bang my head against a brick I keep here in the garage each time when I come across the constant paper publishing sites that wont let me view them because I am not "academic". If the academic population wasnt so high and mighty in many cases better information would be available and you might see more posts backed up by written studies, but from my experience as a hobbyist I am ignored at best. Perhaps the academics in your field of study are less snobbish but I personally have sent hundreds of emails to copepodologists around the world only to get nothing in response, since I am not a student nor do I have time to be one I dont have access to the drove of constantly published works through tools like springer without shelling out a small fortune. I simply do not have the resources. Yet I do spend quite a great deal of time finding references and reading as much as I can get my "hobbyist" hands on, and I am happy for what I can find, it allows me to try and duplicate experiments as well as gleam information about my own why's and what's. But until better references are available for less than the $500.00 pricetags I've been seeing.... I'm going to do it the guerilla way. I've become a big fan of this thread and it's open communication, I'd like to keep it that way and not have people digging on each other over things such as this though. And I do agree it's covered a huge range of topics that could easily be separated. If one wanted to they could build an entire forum around just the contents of this thread. Thats not for me to decide. At this point (to address your grain of salt comment) I think we can all agree that this post has become centered around the more experienced and/or experimental hobbyists and perhaps it's not for new readers to delve into immediately anyways. Perhaps a disclaimer or something simple to point this out? Unfortunately google can be unforgiving and take someone direct to the post matching a query, it's up to the user to read the thread and discern context. As far as tank pics, I have a flatworm experimentation tank (another one of my hobbyist studies) that I've turned into a macro display with a good lump of fuzzy mushrooms to brighten it up. It's not a healthy tank obviously but it looks great. Right now I am purposely keeping nutrients overly high and I can tell you that most mushrooms I've encountered are amazingly resilient. These are propagating like mad! I wouldnt dare put an organ pipe or a chunk of monti in there as it would be plain stupid... a picture of this tank would be stupid to use as a recommendation but nonetheless it looks like a clean and well maintained tank. Without seeing things close up it's hard to make real judgements that's for sure. I highly agree with the consolidation/ split of this thread though, as it would allow those of us discussing to focus on the topic's we're most interested in as well! And keep the thoughts coming! Just an opinion though, and we all know what opinions are like....
__________________
~J |
#207
|
|||
|
|||
thejrc,
Just to be clear I'm not the one asking for references I know how hard they can be to get....impossible without the right subscription etc.... Chris
__________________
"Try to learn something about everything and everything about something" -- Thomas H. Huxley |
#208
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Many become fruststrated in this hobby when they fail--or broke stop enjoying it and leave it for something else that is fun for them. A site like this is base on the premise that we learn by others mistakes. I am thankful that there is such a great group of "experinced people on this site that want to help new people so they don't make the same mistakes. That gets back to the prefix mis -----mistake or misconception--its great to have a thread that "airs" either for debate. If someone sets up a beautiful tank in 6 months---then they should be commended--because they have beat all the odds of "going slowly " Maybe going slowly is a misconception----but I will be the first to say no--go slow-be more successful. From what I have read on the concept of "old tank syndrome" it is simply caused by human error--we stop doing or lose sight of the need to do the things that became routine and gave us success--more time between water changes, not monitoring tank parameter as much etc etc
__________________
"evrr bean to sea Billy--evrr smelled a fish?" "Aye capn..experience is the best teacher" |
#209
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I'm sure it could be caused by slacking off in tank maintenance as well...then again some people report noticable improvement when they "leave the tank alone". I've seen several posts where people didn't have as much time for the tank and couldn't believe how well it had done when they weren't as attentive as they once were. Paul B's tank is 30 years old so I think we would have to call that "ancient tank syndrome" FWIW, Chris
__________________
"Try to learn something about everything and everything about something" -- Thomas H. Huxley |
#210
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
or being well experinced, or street smart to being academic. I would consider myself academic and well read (others might disagree LOL) but I have little experince in salt water reefs. If you read my signature "experience is the best teacher" I stand by that personally. If you did a study of aquarium hobbyists I think you would find that successfull hobbyists consist more of blue collar ---electricians, plumbers, craftsmen, science teachers------rather then people with Phd's. IMO--the best references would be: able to communicate well in a non threatening non patronizing way. thousands of posts that are actually informative--"good job" or would like more doesn't really cut it here years and years of experience years of mentoring with some of the greats in this hobby IMO there isn't a moderator on this site that doesn't have all those qualifications Don't get me wrong --I enjoy discussions and feel I can sift through things that I can buy into or not---so I think it is a waste of time questioning the qualifications of these guys Lets get on with the discussion of misconceptions
__________________
"evrr bean to sea Billy--evrr smelled a fish?" "Aye capn..experience is the best teacher" |
#211
|
|||
|
|||
good point cap'n now on to the discussion at hand, with that PH drop you get in the evening do you have a lighted refugium or not? I've read several cases where running a refugium on opposite light cycle reduces this but I'm not quite sure how.
__________________
~J |
#212
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
IME a kalk drip or dosing kalk some other way evenly throughout the day will keep pH very stable. FWIW you really don't have to keep your pH super stable. A swing of 0.4 or 0.5 is fine. Chris
__________________
"Try to learn something about everything and everything about something" -- Thomas H. Huxley |
#213
|
|||
|
|||
Ok a couple of RC miconceptions:
1) Just because someone has thousands of posts don't assume they know what they are talking about. 2) Just because someone only has a few posts don't assume they don't know what they are talking about. Quote:
Chris
__________________
"Try to learn something about everything and everything about something" -- Thomas H. Huxley Last edited by fishdoc11; 08/26/2007 at 09:18 PM. |
#214
|
|||
|
|||
May I add one Misconception? That acclimation is all about 'time.' Acclimate for an hour, etc., [during which time ph can be a real problem.]
Suggestion: set up your qt tank as close to what comes in from your favorite dealer as possible. Same salinity. Same ph. If the temp is moderately warmer it's not such a big deal as if it's colder. Test the water of the incoming fish. If it matches in salinity, ph, and temp, put the poor critter into qt. Period. Other params are nice, but I've never lost a specimen where salinity and ph both matched and I got the critter into more water, dark, and quiet. Just a suggestion.
__________________
Sk8r "Make haste slowly." ---Augustus. "If anything CAN go wrong, it will, and at the worst possible moment."---St. Murphy. |
#215
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I am not concerned with the swing because it is minimal--just the downward spirial over a week from 8.1---7.9 ending up 7.6 to 7.8 I have tried opening doorrs windows etc at night as much as I can --its still hot out It was suggested that I vent the small plastic air line from the skimmer outside--I am in the process of doing that I realize the bottom line is working with messy kalk and drips etc--something my supplier has been talking me out of the point is what is the harm in a bottom number in the 7.6 range JB--who I have the greatest respect for--says I gotta move it up this pattern has been going on all summer but my corals don't seem to be suffering (tank at 11 months)
__________________
"evrr bean to sea Billy--evrr smelled a fish?" "Aye capn..experience is the best teacher" |
#216
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I did not mean to take number of posts as a criteria----I meant number of posts that were constructive, not off the wall etc--that can be easy checked I think it is a blend of experience and posting. The more you post constructively though the better communicator you become---this gives people on this forum an edge over Phd's in chemistry and biology----any courses I took from them--lets put it this way--eh, huh??
__________________
"evrr bean to sea Billy--evrr smelled a fish?" "Aye capn..experience is the best teacher" |
#217
|
|||
|
|||
7.6 is a little low but if your tank is doing fine I wouldn't worry to much about it. It's best to treat the patient not the lab results
If you want to get it up kalk really isn't that scary. People have been using it to can and dispose of dead bodies for years Misconception: You have to understand all the technical and chemical mumbo jumbo to be a successful reefer. Just not true. It helps to have a basic understanding but having a successful reef is really more of an art than a science IMO. Some people just have a "blue thumb". Chris
__________________
"Try to learn something about everything and everything about something" -- Thomas H. Huxley |
#218
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
So the theory is to get something to consume the CO2 enough to stabilize PH during lights out I suppose he he as far as where reefkeepers come from this is an interesting one to observe (seeing has how I had a club meet yesterday). The couple that got me to switch from brackish to reef do ironwork and etched glass.... my club is made up primarily of IT guys like myself, electricians, database consultants, and even a 14 year old batboy. I type this after reading an article in the 2007 marine fish and reef that illustrates the top 10 traits of good reefkeepers and it even puts a tilt on how many of us are from random walks of life. Keeps it interesting!
__________________
~J Last edited by thejrc; 08/26/2007 at 10:43 PM. |
#219
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
"evrr bean to sea Billy--evrr smelled a fish?" "Aye capn..experience is the best teacher" |
#220
|
|||
|
|||
hmm dunno if it was online, I was at the petco 1$ per gallon sale and it was a total impulse buy while she scanned the random assortment of tanks I was picking up for my pods. I havent been able to find it online yet. was worth the ten bucks though, had an article on worms, an article on breeding seahorses (a little lacking but trimmed for the mag and it was still informative), and a slick article on fungiid plate corals (why I nabbed it). a plenum study and a fairly decent article on light. all in all a good read!
Fishdoc'll tell you though.... after immersing ones self in journal studies and papers on intricacies of things like taxonomy.... reading an over the counter mag in laymans terms is a great great gift! Was nice to understand something for once he he
__________________
~J |
#221
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
IMO successful reefers have good basic science skills: observation--number 1 inquistiveness basic internet skills---eg using sites like these labs skills---for mixing doses properly and using the test kits mechanical skills in basic plumbing, and electrical excellent manipulative skills the may not be formally schooled in these but they exhibit the natural characteristics
__________________
"evrr bean to sea Billy--evrr smelled a fish?" "Aye capn..experience is the best teacher" |
#222
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
spousal negotiation skills! On a serious note though, most the people I run into have a mish mosh of these skills and rely on each other where one lacks. I'm not exactly a star when it comes to chemistry but I've got the interest and the want to learn and naturally I have several friends with the knack where I fall short. It's the interest and the persistance... you can see the lack of persistance in the boards every day when you see the "selling everything" posts where the reason is almost always "dont have the time or interest anymore". Most times these were hobbyists who ran tanks for less than a year from what I've seen. Once your hooked you pretty much stay that way, if your the right type of person!
__________________
~J |
#223
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
"everything costs 20 bucks" except when it comes to the favorite coral they want--then its like that's a lot of money---so nice you care enough about my hobby..... with the ones that give up---sometimes you wished they could have been a little more proactive on sites like Reef Central
__________________
"evrr bean to sea Billy--evrr smelled a fish?" "Aye capn..experience is the best teacher" |
#224
|
|||
|
|||
This thread has been nominated for Thread of the Month. You can vote for it in this poll:
http://archive.reefcentral.com/forum...readid=1193958
__________________
Marc Levenson - member of DFWMAS |
#225
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
As for enjoying reefing. Since I have been doing it for over fifty years I guess I could say I enjoy it. You are also correct about tradesmen having fish. I am an electrician. I aquired my knowledge of reefs from diving on them since 1970. I like hands on experience and all of the animals I have ever kept, I have dove with. Another misconception is natural sea water. The main purpose of using it is not for the beneficail life which will probably die in our tanks in a few hours but the chemical make up which can not exactly be duplicated. Sea water changes with factors like pH and temp. Have a great day. Paul |
|
|