View Full Version : Is 29 a nano?
just_in_time
03/21/2006, 08:41 PM
Just curious if my 29 gallon would be considered a nano since I have seen 24 gallon nanos. What do you all think?
nanowiz
03/21/2006, 08:59 PM
heck yes a 29 is a nano, i think that anything under 29gal is a nano. your good dude :)
egdevilboy
03/21/2006, 09:22 PM
Personal opinion, but anything under 40-50 gallons is a nano.
just_in_time
03/21/2006, 10:17 PM
What would be a pico then?
alien9168
03/21/2006, 10:45 PM
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7010182#post7010182 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by egdevilboy
Personal opinion, but anything under 40-50 gallons is a nano.
I agree completly. :rollface:
-alien
Tony Campos
03/21/2006, 11:37 PM
Pico would be 3g or less.
bendavis
03/22/2006, 01:31 PM
hmm... i have a 29g and dont consider it a nano. We purchased an 18g recently, and i am still having problems considering it a nano. i would think 10 and under would be nano. 10-35 would be tiny-ish. and the rest would be... whatever.
just my humble opinion. kinda like a belly button.
-Ben
Gem Tang Rider
03/22/2006, 06:10 PM
Anything under a 15gal is a nano IMO.
kabal2
03/22/2006, 06:21 PM
anything under 30g is a nano, and under 3 a pico
zorics
03/22/2006, 06:59 PM
*nodd*
do we have a pico forum?? :D
alien9168
03/22/2006, 07:26 PM
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7017188#post7017188 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by kabal2
anything under 30g is a nano, and under 3 a pico
Nicly put! :)
-alien
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.