View Full Version : can someone look at this bulb?
swashbuckler
06/17/2005, 11:31 AM
im sure these are VHO's but i dont see any marking indicating that its 95W - only a strange code with the word VHO on the end.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v47/d_fishman77/VHO.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v47/d_fishman77/VHO1.jpg
i see the number 30 which worries me b/c 30W is the NO version.
Acroholic
06/17/2005, 11:38 AM
What is the length of that bulb? 36"?
sylaak
06/17/2005, 11:41 AM
24" = 75w
36" = 95w
46.5" = 110w
48" = 110w
60" = 140w
72" = 160w
swashbuckler
06/17/2005, 11:41 AM
yes, 36" 95W URI SUPER ACTINIC
Acroholic
06/17/2005, 11:43 AM
Yes, it is 95W.
It is a URI Super Actinic = 100% Blue Spectrum
This bulb also has a 180 degree internal reflector built in, and it is advertised to increase light output by 40%.
Great Bulbs...
swashbuckler
06/17/2005, 11:45 AM
i wonder why they dont mark the wattage?
myakkareef
06/17/2005, 02:53 PM
Originally posted by sylaak
24" = 75w
36" = 95w
46.5" = 110w
48" = 110w
60" = 140w
72" = 160w
I believe they do not mark the wattage because the length determines the wattage...
Entropy
06/17/2005, 03:02 PM
Probably because it depends on what ballast you end up using. I notice you got one of the new bulbs (UVI instead of URI). Any difference in coloring?
Wattage=Bulb length x ballast power input x voltage x amperage x left shoe size x convient number (call it power factor or somthing) that will make your setup more efficient than the next guys setup. :D
swashbuckler
06/17/2005, 03:07 PM
wow! ahh nuts, where's a calculator when you need one?! :D
but i wish i can tell you entropy if its different- unfortunatly, i have no prior experience with the earlier "URI" bulbs.
VinceC
06/17/2005, 03:09 PM
URI Code Number from Catalog
Super Actinic
FR30T12/VHO = 36" 95W
Vince
swashbuckler
06/17/2005, 04:29 PM
oh boy! thats the answer! thank you VinceC and thanks to all others for chiming in! :)
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.