werent_still
02/17/2004, 04:24 PM
I have recently read in a very reliable resource (Dr. Eric's book) that strontium is widely taken up by stony corals (to equal the concentrations in the surrounding environment) but is then mostly secreted back out through the tissue and not housed within the stony structure in large quantities...
I was just wondering if anyone had any clue as to why the strontium is perhaps actively removed --- i am currently studying the effects of strontium in human bone (which similarily takes up strontium in equal proportions to environment concentrations); however, in bone the strontium concentrations remain fairly constant - i have hypothesized that this is due to the fact that the turnover rate of human bone is approximately 10 years or so... does anyone know the turnover rate of stony coral structure if one exists (i am referrring to the breakdown and repair of slightly fractured coral skeletons etc...)
thanks everyone...
I was just wondering if anyone had any clue as to why the strontium is perhaps actively removed --- i am currently studying the effects of strontium in human bone (which similarily takes up strontium in equal proportions to environment concentrations); however, in bone the strontium concentrations remain fairly constant - i have hypothesized that this is due to the fact that the turnover rate of human bone is approximately 10 years or so... does anyone know the turnover rate of stony coral structure if one exists (i am referrring to the breakdown and repair of slightly fractured coral skeletons etc...)
thanks everyone...