Scissorhand
06/10/2007, 12:27 AM
Hi guys...
While I was on a quest for an elusive used Tunze TS21 set-up, I ran across an interesting thread wherein a reefer claimed that studies have shown that corals (SPS in this case) grow faster with constant strong flow as opposed to random flow that the Tunze provide. Thus, the only advantage would be, and this is still a bit questionable, that random flow would eliminate more dead spot.
I'm interested to know what you think or know. Of course, one of the major selling points of wavemakers; whether it be Seio, Tunze or Red Sea and co., is that a wavemakers mimic the natural wave of the ocean, therefore it's better for the corals. Now, is that a fact or merely a gimmick to trick us into buying equipments that perhaps aren't necessary.
Or maybe I'm just thinking too much. God knows I want the controller just ... er because it's cool.
While I was on a quest for an elusive used Tunze TS21 set-up, I ran across an interesting thread wherein a reefer claimed that studies have shown that corals (SPS in this case) grow faster with constant strong flow as opposed to random flow that the Tunze provide. Thus, the only advantage would be, and this is still a bit questionable, that random flow would eliminate more dead spot.
I'm interested to know what you think or know. Of course, one of the major selling points of wavemakers; whether it be Seio, Tunze or Red Sea and co., is that a wavemakers mimic the natural wave of the ocean, therefore it's better for the corals. Now, is that a fact or merely a gimmick to trick us into buying equipments that perhaps aren't necessary.
Or maybe I'm just thinking too much. God knows I want the controller just ... er because it's cool.