Reef Central Online Community

Home Forum Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences View New Posts View Today's Posts

Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Search Reefkeeping ...an online magazine for marine aquarists Support our sponsors and mention Reef Central

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community Archives > General Interest Forums > The Reef Chemistry Forum

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11/28/2007, 11:49 AM
chujai chujai is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 117
Phosphate Media Reviews

Hi,

I was lucky enough to get a search through and i couldnt find any threads on here where people compaired a few different phosphate removal medias... i was hoping to get some input from others with some experiance.


I dont have a phospate test kit which i know i should get but from what i see this is what i experianced.

I personally am using the 2 little fish phosban reactor with the ROWAPhos media. i find this stuff works well cause when i ran out, i quickly had increase of growth in diatoms and film algae.

i went out to LFS and they only carried a different type. i think Polyp Lab Opti-Phos and it wasnt as effective i find. the diatom just didnt leave even after a month. it didnt increase, but it didnt go away.

then when i finally got some of the rowaphos back, within a week the diatoms were gone and the film algae was under control

I know this wasnt very scientific without actual test kits but just my experiance.

anyone else had other experiances with other medias like Kent Marine Phosphate Sponge
Seachem PhosGuard
PhosBan
or any other ones? Thanks
  #2  
Old 11/28/2007, 12:28 PM
Ninong Ninong is offline
Team RC Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 2,191
Phosguard is aluminum trioxide (Al2O3), also called alumina. I wouldn't use that product for the reasons set forth by Dr. Randy Holmes-Farley in this article.

I would use one of the iron oxide/hydroxide products, such as Rowaphos.

Good luck!

__________________
Ninong
  #3  
Old 11/28/2007, 12:55 PM
chujai chujai is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 117
ah, thanks for the info.

i guess it would be more acceptable in a FOWLR tank.
__________________
"I want nemos" started it all....
  #4  
Old 11/28/2007, 12:59 PM
capn_hylinur capn_hylinur is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 4,582
this thread was thread of the month for sept--a good read:

http://archive.reefcentral.com/forum...readid=1182318
__________________
"evrr bean to sea Billy--evrr smelled a fish?" "Aye capn..experience is the best teacher"
  #5  
Old 11/28/2007, 05:28 PM
Charlie's Angel Charlie's Angel is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 378
I just switched from Seachem Phosgaurd to Warner Marine ReefPure PhosAR and love it. I just have it in a media chamber in my sump with water running into the chamber.
  #6  
Old 11/29/2007, 02:27 AM
chujai chujai is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 117
oooo that is a good one thanks!
__________________
"I want nemos" started it all....
  #7  
Old 11/29/2007, 02:35 AM
Billybeau1 Billybeau1 is offline
Team RC Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Dyer, Indiana
Posts: 6,369
I also use the PhoSar and it is the best I've tried to date.

Highly recommended.
  #8  
Old 11/29/2007, 09:15 AM
capn_hylinur capn_hylinur is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 4,582
Quote:
Originally posted by Billybeau1
I also use the PhoSar and it is the best I've tried to date.

Highly recommended.
compared to phosban--what do you see as the big difference?
__________________
"evrr bean to sea Billy--evrr smelled a fish?" "Aye capn..experience is the best teacher"
  #9  
Old 11/29/2007, 12:29 PM
old salty old salty is offline
Mortar Target
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Island of Misfit Toys
Posts: 2,870
I used to use Rowaphos, but decided to try Warner Marine's Phosar. After a year of use, I have to report that this is one of the very few areas where the low cost stuff is equal to or better than the stuff costing three times as much. Rowaphos is sold damp, so you are paying for the weight of the water they add to it. I also find that the pellet structure of the Phosar prevents the clumping and subsequent channeling of the media.
__________________
The irony of 2007 is a disgustingly fat multi-millionaire trying to tell me I need to cut back on my consumption.
  #10  
Old 11/29/2007, 12:52 PM
jdieck jdieck is offline
Flea Slide
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Naperville IL
Posts: 12,458
I had the opportunity to run a comparison test between what at the time (last year) I considered the three most used and available Iron Oxide Hydroxide based media, Phosban from TLF, Rowaphos from Rowa and PHOsR from Warner Marine.
Since then there has been other medias available that may or may not be better, I even found one that claims to be regenerable.
In any case these are my observations.

a) Physical: As mentioned above PHOsR comes on a pelletized form while Rowa and Phosban come in irregularly shaped grains.
Rinsing the media is important so my observation was that Rowa and phosban have a lot more fines requiring a significant more rinsing than PHOsR.

b) Adsorption:
In adsorption tests Rowaphos showed to be the one that adsorbed the most phosphate (2 to 3 times more than Phosban or PHOsR) in less than half the time. This effectiveness seems to be a potential reason why there seems to be more claims of sudden shock with Rowa than with other medias so if using rowa it is advisable to start with small quantities and increase as the phosphate level increases.

Now having said that in long term tests the media that lasted longer and in total ended up adsorbing more was the PHOsR from Warner Marine.
The explanation I find for this is basically that given the shape of the media, PHOsR allows a better more uniform flow throughout the media effectively using all of it. Rowaphos and Phosban have a marked tendency to get channeling in the reactor and to clump together easier thus blocking the flow and coating some of the grains making the media unable to be fully utilized.

c) Having the initial results and decided on using PHOsR I tested it's potential for creating undesirable reaction in the critters, to do so I used four times the recommended quantity to see if it had some effect on the critters. The only result was that the media lasted more than eight months and mini-stars, worms, feather dusters and snails started living in the reactor for which I could conclude that the media is really safe to use if fines are not allowed to pass into the system.

For the Phosphate testing I used a colorimeter and for short term adsorption I used a standard phosphate solution of 1 ppm, all equipment between tests was cleaned using high purity hydrochloric acid.

Since the time of my tests Warner has come out with a new media PHOsR HC that although not pelletized is claimed to adsorb three times more than regular PHOsR and to be less prone to break apart and with higher density so higher flow could be used in the reactor.
__________________
Did I write what I wrote? What the heck am I talking about! Well..... Nevermind.
  #11  
Old 11/29/2007, 01:49 PM
xtm xtm is offline
_________________
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,945
jdieck - very informative post, as always. Thanks.
I just started using PhosAR and I'm curious as to what this "pelletized" shape that you're referring to? The PhosAR that I bought looks exactly the same as TLF Phosban (tiny sand-like grains) maybe they gave me the wrong GFO.....
__________________
Have Frags - Will Travel
  #12  
Old 11/29/2007, 03:04 PM
jdieck jdieck is offline
Flea Slide
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Naperville IL
Posts: 12,458
Probably you got the newer PHOSaR HC which is granular like Phosban although darker in color and heavier. The regular PHOsR has a white label, if I remember well the newer HC has a silver label.

This is what regular PHOSaR looks like:
__________________
Did I write what I wrote? What the heck am I talking about! Well..... Nevermind.

Last edited by jdieck; 11/29/2007 at 03:12 PM.
  #13  
Old 11/29/2007, 03:28 PM
xtm xtm is offline
_________________
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,945
Ok that's not the PhosAR that I received and I didn't order an HC. Did they just change the granule shapes?

I have about 6 spoons of it tumbling in the reactor for two days now and I STILL see algae all over the tank
__________________
Have Frags - Will Travel
  #14  
Old 11/29/2007, 04:56 PM
ReefWreak ReefWreak is offline
#1 Acro Crab Killah
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Boca Raton or Tallahassee - Florida State University
Posts: 2,628
After 7 years in the hobby, you should expect that nothing good happens quickly. You'll never see algae disappear in 2 days unless you're removing it by hand or something is eating it. You'd be lucky to see it slowly roll back over a week.

EDIT:
Yea I went back through JetCat's thread on the testing with the photometer, but I still wouldn't expect the same results. Maybe I'm a pessimist.

Good luck regardless.

Last edited by ReefWreak; 11/29/2007 at 05:02 PM.
  #15  
Old 11/29/2007, 05:06 PM
xtm xtm is offline
_________________
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,945
Thanks for the reply.. I'll wait a few more days and see.
__________________
Have Frags - Will Travel
  #16  
Old 12/14/2007, 07:24 AM
tizzy tizzy is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Miami
Posts: 52
PHOSar size

I ordered some, but the pieces are soooooooooooo small they can easily leak out of a bag, and don't even think of using them in a reactor. I used a double media filter on each side and the pieces still went through on both ends.
  #17  
Old 12/14/2007, 09:06 AM
daven daven is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 220
I've been removing the algae by hand and then eating it. Like ancient warriors eating the hearts of their captives. Makes me ready for the next battle with HA. Tasty.


Just kidding.
  #18  
Old 12/14/2007, 09:32 AM
rwbogard rwbogard is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 41
[violation]

Last edited by mhurley; 12/14/2007 at 10:26 AM.
  #19  
Old 12/14/2007, 10:10 AM
Randy Holmes-Farley Randy Holmes-Farley is offline
Reef Chemist
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Arlington, Massachusetts
Posts: 52,068
Do you think we are stupid, rwbogard?

Not only did it work for you, but you sell it, don't you.

That kind of schilling is not welcome or allowed here.
__________________
Randy Holmes-Farley

Last edited by Randy Holmes-Farley; 12/14/2007 at 10:51 AM.
  #20  
Old 12/14/2007, 10:33 AM
trueperc trueperc is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ottawa, On, Canada
Posts: 334
Myself I have tried phos lock and it didn't work well at all. Rowaphos worked great but way to prices, I actually just tried the Polyp Lab Opti-Phos and I didn't care for it one bit, it barely worked and very pricey. Right now I just tried the phos remover from two part solutions, in 2 days my phos went from .5 to 0.03 or lower. For the price I will most likely stick with this. I am using the pelletized.
  #21  
Old 12/14/2007, 10:34 AM
chujai chujai is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 117
i find the rowaphos also sometimes can be so small that it falls out of media bag or out of the reactor too... and i hate rinsing it before having to use it.

but that phosar pellet stuff looks really good. i still havent seen any canadian distributers..
__________________
"I want nemos" started it all....
  #22  
Old 12/14/2007, 10:36 AM
chujai chujai is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 117
hey true perc which two part solutions is it that you are talking about?

is that the brand? i just want to look it up. thanks.
__________________
"I want nemos" started it all....
  #23  
Old 12/14/2007, 10:57 AM
Randy Holmes-Farley Randy Holmes-Farley is offline
Reef Chemist
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Arlington, Massachusetts
Posts: 52,068
He would be talking about this RC sponsor:

http://reefcentral.com/ads/adclick.p...rtsolution.com
__________________
Randy Holmes-Farley
  #24  
Old 12/14/2007, 01:01 PM
capn_hylinur capn_hylinur is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 4,582
Re: PHOSar size

Quote:
Originally posted by tizzy
I ordered some, but the pieces are soooooooooooo small they can easily leak out of a bag, and don't even think of using them in a reactor. I used a double media filter on each side and the pieces still went through on both ends.
I use carbon and phosban in the reactors---with changes I put the filter sock back on and direct their return lines through it for a min, then remove the bag again.

Next change I'm going to use jDieck's suggestion---thanks JD--that was a good report.
__________________
"evrr bean to sea Billy--evrr smelled a fish?" "Aye capn..experience is the best teacher"
  #25  
Old 12/14/2007, 04:35 PM
md14fish md14fish is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: LI,NY
Posts: 146
Kent PO4 sponge is a waste. It has to be replaced every couple of days.
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef Central™ Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2009