Reef Central Online Community

Home Forum Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences View New Posts View Today's Posts

Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Search Reefkeeping ...an online magazine for marine aquarists Support our sponsors and mention Reef Central

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community Archives > Invert and Plant Forums > Tridacnid Clams and other Mollusks

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09/22/2005, 02:11 AM
NorCalTRD NorCalTRD is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 5
144W PC enough?

I have a nano-cube and was just wondering if my 144watts of pc lighting would be enough for any species of clam?


Thanks a lot,
Jordan
  #2  
Old 09/22/2005, 10:06 AM
BLKTANG BLKTANG is offline
No Lorenzo in my Benzo
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Never,Never Land
Posts: 3,264
What size do you consider nano?
__________________
We the few have done so much,for so long,for so little.That we are now qualified to do anything with nothing.
  #3  
Old 09/22/2005, 10:07 AM
BLKTANG BLKTANG is offline
No Lorenzo in my Benzo
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Never,Never Land
Posts: 3,264
O-Yeah just noticed your posts.


[welcome]
__________________
We the few have done so much,for so long,for so little.That we are now qualified to do anything with nothing.
  #4  
Old 09/22/2005, 07:20 PM
NorCalTRD NorCalTRD is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 5
So... Do you think that is sufficiant or no? If so, what species would everyone suggest as a starter clam seeing that I have never had one before? Derasa? Squamosa? Help please...

Thanks,
Jordan
  #5  
Old 09/22/2005, 10:02 PM
Peabody Peabody is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 2,733
I'm afraid the answer is no. While it's enough light to maybe sustain a derasa or squamosa, they will quickly outgrow the tank, and even before that, are most often too chemically demanding on such a small system.

While Maxima or crocea would stay small enough, the light intensity (PAR) isn't enough. If you used a 150w Metal Halide bulb, then the PAR would be sufficient.
  #6  
Old 09/23/2005, 01:24 AM
NorCalTRD NorCalTRD is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 5
So... is a 150w MH more powerful than 144w of PC by more than just 6w? I dont know too much about metal halide lighting other than how hot it gets. haha.

Jordan
  #7  
Old 09/23/2005, 01:19 PM
BLKTANG BLKTANG is offline
No Lorenzo in my Benzo
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Never,Never Land
Posts: 3,264
I have 150 MH on 10g
__________________
We the few have done so much,for so long,for so little.That we are now qualified to do anything with nothing.
  #8  
Old 09/23/2005, 04:21 PM
s3aL s3aL is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Fairfield, California
Posts: 818
150w of MH is probably 3-4x stronger than 144w of PC. You gotta look into the PAR ratings and not watts.
__________________
58g oceanic (36x18x21)
36" Aquatinics 2x175w MH 2x39w T5
Deltec MCE600
3x Koralia 3's
Litermeter3
Dual stage Ranco controller

Matt
  #9  
Old 09/23/2005, 07:46 PM
vthondaboi vthondaboi is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 784
Lighting is very much about the "intensity"

Metal Halides are much more intense than VHO or PC lighting and that's what the maximas and croceas need.
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef Central™ Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2009