Reef Central Online Community

Home Forum Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences View New Posts View Today's Posts

Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Search Reefkeeping ...an online magazine for marine aquarists Support our sponsors and mention Reef Central

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community Archives > Special Interest Group (SIG) Forums > Photography
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12/15/2007, 07:09 PM
seansod seansod is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Virginia Beach, Va.
Posts: 129
First try with new Nikon D40X

This is my first attempt for closeups using my new Nikon D40X and the included 18-55mm lens.



Is the picture so grainy because of the ISO setting?

ISO 800 1/80 F4.5
  #2  
Old 12/15/2007, 07:41 PM
reefman13 reefman13 is offline
Enjoying Life
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ridgefield, CT
Posts: 2,944
That would be correct, as well as the quality of the starter lens, as well as the possibility for fine particles in your water.....For real close ups, you will need a macro lens.

Pretty good first close-up though.
__________________
~~Dave~~
______________________________________________________________________
"Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish, and feed him for a lifetime." -An old chinese proverb
  #3  
Old 12/15/2007, 08:47 PM
purplereef purplereef is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chardon, Ohio
Posts: 300
Not a bad first picture. I am in the same boat as you Seansod. I just got a Nikon D40X as well. I think everyone would agree that a Sigma 105mm would be a good Macro lens to get. What will be good settings for this camera once this lens is bought? Thanks, I didn't mean to derail your thread Seansod.
__________________
SPS dominated 90 gallon.
  #4  
Old 12/15/2007, 10:39 PM
Phyl Phyl is offline
NJ Reefers Club
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,406
definitely grainier because of the high ISO. Try it between 200 & 400.
__________________
Phyllis
NJRC President
MASNA Public Relations
  #5  
Old 12/15/2007, 10:53 PM
Engine 7 Engine 7 is offline
Wet Hand Club of Chicago
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,304
I think it looks great for a first pic
__________________
Jeff

------------------------------------------------
If you work on a lobster boat, sneaking up behind someone and pinching him is probably a joke that gets old real fast
  #6  
Old 12/15/2007, 11:00 PM
seansod seansod is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Virginia Beach, Va.
Posts: 129
Allright I tried a few more shots today.

These are in my frag tank under 2 X 20K 400W MH

ISO 400 1/200 f5.6 +3EV 52mm focal length


ISO 400 1/400 f5.3 +3EV 46mm focal length


ISO 400 1/200 f5.6 +2.7EV 55mm focal length
The milli was sticking out of the water because I turned off the return


Thanks for any coments

Tony
  #7  
Old 12/15/2007, 11:07 PM
seansod seansod is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Virginia Beach, Va.
Posts: 129
Quote:
Originally posted by Engine 7
I think it looks great for a first pic
Thanks, I can only hope to get as good as half of the people here.
  #8  
Old 12/15/2007, 11:36 PM
ssbreef ssbreef is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Montreal
Posts: 812
Nice pics.
One question. Is it normal to have so much noise at ISO400.(Nikon Users)
__________________
180g inwall, 89Xturnover, Deltec Ap1004 Skimmer, Deltec PF1001 CR, Deltec KM 500S KS, Octopus 3000, AquaZone Ozone, 1218Watts-MH+VHO+T5, 120g sump, 77g Refuge
  #9  
Old 12/16/2007, 12:57 PM
maxalmon maxalmon is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 246
Try putting the camera in "A" mode, then set the iso @200 and the fstop at 14-18 (this depends on how much depth of field you want). Autofocus OFF, Tripod is a MUST if you don't have the remote, then use the timer feature.
  #10  
Old 12/16/2007, 01:04 PM
purplereef purplereef is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chardon, Ohio
Posts: 300
Here is my first attempt with my new Nikon D40X.


__________________
SPS dominated 90 gallon.
  #11  
Old 12/16/2007, 02:10 PM
seansod seansod is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Virginia Beach, Va.
Posts: 129
Quote:
Originally posted by maxalmon
Try putting the camera in "A" mode, then set the iso @200 and the fstop at 14-18 (this depends on how much depth of field you want). Autofocus OFF, Tripod is a MUST if you don't have the remote, then use the timer feature.
Thanks I will try that.
  #12  
Old 12/16/2007, 09:39 PM
seansod seansod is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Virginia Beach, Va.
Posts: 129
Here is a picture of one of my Blue Tort frags



ISO 100 120 F11

I know still a little dark trying to work on that
  #13  
Old 12/17/2007, 12:43 PM
juniormc8704 juniormc8704 is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit Michigan
Posts: 205
ive found that using exposure compensation can add to the grain. use a tripod, and the self timer, and longer shutter speeds. i shoot almost everything at iso 100, but yes nikon does suffer from graininess at rather low ISO. IMHO thats where canon really putsw the screws to nikon. But i still love my d80
  #14  
Old 12/17/2007, 12:55 PM
beerguy beerguy is offline
RC Staff & Thread Pirate
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The left coast
Posts: 12,970
The best protection about noise or "grain" as some have called it, is to expose the shot properly. Any time you try to brighten an image, even if you start with a RAW file, you're going to add noise.

In practice, you want to have the histogram as close as possible to the right edge without touching it.

You should also apply noise reduction prior to any sharpening to prevent the sharpening from exaggerating the noise.

NoiseNinja and Noiseware both have PS plugins to help with this stuff.


Even when you have an extreme noise problem, like in that first shot, there's often much improvement that you can do:

__________________
Doug - v2.0.4

Nuclear winter solves global warming.
  #15  
Old 12/17/2007, 05:23 PM
seansod seansod is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Virginia Beach, Va.
Posts: 129
How did you get the noise out of the shroom shot?

You are right the noise was caused by compensating for exposure in post processing.

Thanks
  #16  
Old 12/17/2007, 05:29 PM
beerguy beerguy is offline
RC Staff & Thread Pirate
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The left coast
Posts: 12,970
I did a couple of things.

1. Ran it through Noiseware at the default setting. That helped but the top half of the image was still very noisy.

2. I used a gaussian blur with a mask to soften the rest of the noise.
__________________
Doug - v2.0.4

Nuclear winter solves global warming.
  #17  
Old 12/17/2007, 07:03 PM
seansod seansod is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Virginia Beach, Va.
Posts: 129
Thanks, I downloaded a trial version of Noiseware and ran the filter after playing with some of the settings.

Here is the orginial picture with my filtering attempt.



Thanks again

Anyother software that I should tryout
  #18  
Old 12/17/2007, 07:04 PM
beerguy beerguy is offline
RC Staff & Thread Pirate
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The left coast
Posts: 12,970
I've got NoiseNinja too but Noiseware seems to work better for me.

Cheers
__________________
Doug - v2.0.4

Nuclear winter solves global warming.
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef Central™ Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2009