Reef Central Online Community

Home Forum Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences View New Posts View Today's Posts

Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Search Reefkeeping ...an online magazine for marine aquarists Support our sponsors and mention Reef Central

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community Archives > General Interest Forums > Responsible Reefkeeping

View Poll Results: What is the Main Cause Of Global Warming?
CO2 and other green house gasses 18 64.29%
the sun 8 28.57%
whats global warming? 2 7.14%
Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07/14/2007, 01:40 PM
BCreefmaker BCreefmaker is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 674
Human Related Global Warming

i was just wondering what people currently think about the causes for global warming? this poll hopefully will not only give me some insight into the views of other ecologically minded people on global warming and its causes, but also give me some objective views into this movie i just saw, because it changed my view of global warming in a second, but i just want to make shure it makes sense to others also. befor i go on, i would just like to say: yes i am a so called " heretic" i do no longer believe in global warming being caused by humans. we have to kinda be full of our selves to believe that we have more impact over this earth then the sun, the moon, the ocean, the clouds , and all the other biological processes going on 24/7/365. however, i still think a future built on renewable resources, more efficient methods, reducing pollution, and recycling is key. so now on to the real question, the poll, and the debate im not really even sure if this is what most people already think here.

i think this program has only been broadcast on t.v. only in Australia

please vote after watching the video!

Great Global Warming Swindle
__________________
To make apple pie from scratch, You must first create the universe.
  #2  
Old 07/14/2007, 01:49 PM
Sk8r Sk8r is offline
Team RC Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 12,245
Let's put it this way: the world has been warming since the last ice age, which is why we're not armpit deep in ice.

It continues to warm and dry.

Eventually it will trip the thermohaline conveyor trigger and we will ice over again.

If we don't use our current resources to build answers for this problem before it happens, and develop means to combat the pre-flip heat, we will be in deep kimchee when the situation worsens.

Can we slow down the rate by reforming? A bit. But it's more important to support research and development of means to restart the conveyor/vs. is it a good idea to restart the conveyor, and how to feed billions who'll be caught in a bad spot.

We need to quit bickering over details and get ready, because it will happen.
__________________
Sk8r

"Make haste slowly." ---Augustus.

"If anything CAN go wrong, it will, and at the worst possible moment."---St. Murphy.
  #3  
Old 07/14/2007, 02:04 PM
BCreefmaker BCreefmaker is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 674
lol did you even watch the movie sk8ter? its an hour long movie.... you posted nine mins after me... sorry to say you have been brain washed by the American/ European media into repeating facts that have been skewed. this movies clearly points out there have been times in human history where the mean earth temp has been several degrees higher then what it is now, and guess what it was a golden age in the midevil period, when many cathedrals were build because crops were so plentiful, and again for an even longer period in the bronze age the temp was even higher then the last midevil spike, and it lasted for 800 years! and the polar bears survived fine!
__________________
To make apple pie from scratch, You must first create the universe.

Last edited by BCreefmaker; 07/14/2007 at 02:12 PM.
  #4  
Old 07/14/2007, 05:02 PM
greenbean36191 greenbean36191 is offline
Soul of a Sailor
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Huntsville/ Auburn, AL
Posts: 7,859
There is no doubt that global warming is real. There is no doubt that natural causes are to blame. There is no doubt that humans are also to blame.

Rather than developing your views about ANY science topic based on propaganda videos or the mass media have a look at the primary sources.
__________________
Lanikai, kahakai nani, aloha no au ia 'oe. A hui hou kakou.
  #5  
Old 07/14/2007, 08:55 PM
Sk8r Sk8r is offline
Team RC Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 12,245
BCReefmaker, I've spent decades studying history and climatology, degree in classics, specialty in med. archaeology, which is a mere blip in the 13,000 years since the last melt. Temp goes up, it comes down, happens all the time: volcanoes blow, temp cools for a few years, temp rises again; Vikings tried to colonize mid Atlantic, worked short-term, then they got hit with the Little Ice Age. I also know astronomy, and yes, it's possible the sun blips every 500 years---there's quite a lot of talk about this possibility in in classics: barbarians ran out of grass and headed south every 500 years and we're at a 500 year mark at the moment...makes history convenient to remember if you peg your invasions at around 0, 500, 100, 1500 bc and ad, but it's only a generality. And the plain fact is the earth has gotten warmer over the last 13,000 years, the reefs we know have formed during the last 13,000 years, and the climate has gone on changing for the last 13,000 years. Prior to that, there were other icing periods. As long as plate tectonics keeps the continents approximately in their current configuration---they drift very, very slowly---the thermohaline conveyor is going to go on doing its thing and driving the currents that keep Britain and western north america moderate, etc., etc. But when it stops, as it will if it gets too much fresh water dumped in, we will likely ice again. 13,000 years itself is a blip, but in human/protohuman history, this tends to be the story, repeated glaciations and warming periods. The sun, while possibly a player [I used to tell my students watch what happens around 2000 AD because theory has it that solar output or sunspot activity may undergo something interesting, and we may have a hot dry spell in the Tarim Basin and N.America, but that's a minor 500 year cycle. The El Nino/La Nina cycles probably [imho] only date to the current continental configuration, but do figure in: MesoAmerican archaeology shows periods of extreme drought, etc.
But the simple point is---we had really big ice sheets, not once, but multiple times during the time the continents have been roughly configured as they are; and with a warming trend in place, with minor blips up and down, since 13000 years ago, we are likely in for a bit more heat and then a sincere need of parkas.
__________________
Sk8r

"Make haste slowly." ---Augustus.

"If anything CAN go wrong, it will, and at the worst possible moment."---St. Murphy.
  #6  
Old 07/15/2007, 08:36 AM
billsreef billsreef is offline
Moderator
10 & Over Club
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 12,688
Sure we have to be full of ourselves to believe we have a greater impact than the sun, moon, etc. But we also have to be equally full of ourselves to believe we don't have an impact on our environment. As greenbean mentions, you really want to go back to the primary source literature and not use the mass media to form your opinions. The mass media is full of holes, errors, omissions, and agenda's on both sides of the issue. The climate scientists have never said we're causing global warming, only that our increasing greenhouse gas emissions will cause the natural warming cycles to amplify, i.e. happen faster and peak higher than they would without our contributions. So yes, it would happen without us, just a tad slower, and not quite as hot. In any event, no matter what you think of the issue in regards to global warming, increased pollution simply isn't healthy for us and we should do all we can to reduce such pollution.
__________________
Bill

"LOL, well I have no brain apparently. " - dc (Debi)
  #7  
Old 07/15/2007, 08:56 AM
Sk8r Sk8r is offline
Team RC Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 12,245
Just one of those curious thoughts, in addition: we may have had one global ice-down in the longago, very long ago---records in north africa, among others, [dropstones in the tail end of the Atlas Mts.] , but in general, the ice ages as we think of ice ages all happened in geologically recent time---since the rise of the mammals, notably since the rise of us---and WE are not the culprits: we weren't numerous enough. What does generally matter is the configuration of the continents. As long as the currents run where they do, up by the north Atlantic turnaround, and as long as that meteor pocked little stretch of extreme northern Canada exists, and as long as the [you know there's no land under it] north pole is locked in a circle of usually icy land, the potential exists for a big wash of fresh water coming into that region of the Atlantic and screwing up the Conveyor.

This potential didn't exist in prior alignments of the continents, and by what appears in the geologic record, no ice ages, except that one possible global blip back aeons ago.

So it would seem to make a very, very strong case that what goes on to cause the cycle of ice-down and warmup is continental position and global ocean flow in the mode we have now---a very strong, long period [centuries] flow in a very nice long cycle of high and low currents, that keep everything stirred up.

In all the time there've been homosapienssapiens, we've enjoyed tolerably warm weather, warming and drying continually. Signs are upon us that we're near the max of the cycle, which won't be friendly to our agriculture, and that we need to do differently than we do to gain ourselves some time to adapt to the changes. On the other hand, if we don't, it may happen faster, and as I say, we may need parkas rather soon after we see the peak of the cycle.
__________________
Sk8r

"Make haste slowly." ---Augustus.

"If anything CAN go wrong, it will, and at the worst possible moment."---St. Murphy.
  #8  
Old 07/15/2007, 01:25 PM
BCreefmaker BCreefmaker is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 674
sk8r, i dont think you will ever get it dude. yes the earth goes thorough ice cycles, however we dont control anything really, if the sun next 3 years were to produce half as many solar flares, humanity would go into a mini ice age or possibly a full blown one. and the complete opposite if the solar flares doubled. in either situation the changes to the earth are natural, and they would be so great and wide spread we could do very little to reverse the changes. and the fact of the matter would be we could do nothing, because we were mostly concerned with climate preservation in the terms of anti-globalization. like i stated in my first post i still believe in recycling, conservation, getting rid of pollution, and so on. however if you do think thats your biggest thing to worry about, how to stop global warming from happening and preserve our current climate, you sir are very delusional. if your that worried learn and teach your children how to make igloos and ice fish! i live in Canada so i already know how! so bring it SUN! BRING IT ON! and yes poor Africa, i love that one quote "saying you can only have solar and wind energy is like saying you cant have any energy" why oppress other countries growth for our political beliefs and not real science.

remember hippies and commies love global warming, its just another justification to do anything for "positive change"!
__________________
To make apple pie from scratch, You must first create the universe.

Last edited by BCreefmaker; 07/15/2007 at 01:31 PM.
  #9  
Old 07/15/2007, 01:56 PM
Sk8r Sk8r is offline
Team RC Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 12,245
BCreefmaker, I don't think you're thinking on a large enough scale. Solar sats, tide-driven or current driven pumps, all capable of development in a direct assault on a zonal cool-down. What we could do by focusing high energy input on critical areas is limited by two things: building the system, technologically feasible but untested, and b, knowing what we're doing if we give the Conveyor that kind of shove. Recall that ice ages as experienced during human history aren't global, but zonal: the poles get colder and the equator simultaneously gets hotter and wetter. All this equals the same amount of energy in the system, just that the distribution system has glitched, and all the heat is staying in one place. Planetary correction: the source of the imbalance goes away, the freshwater freezes up at the poles again, and the conveyor re-starts automatically. Do we want to hasten it? Is it a good idea to meddle? It seems, on the surface, to be a system where we can't exactly change the solar output, but we can redirect it, which is pretty much what the conveyor does. How much is enough? How soon to interfere? How long to interfere? It's like managing a dam---if you don't open the floodgates soon enough the whole dam fails and you've got everybody in deep water and mad because they lost their houses. If you open the sluice and it turns out you might possibly not have needed to, but 3 houses went downstream, those people are really mad...are they justified? Does everybody else owe them compensation for the fact they lost everything to potentially save the houses of the others?

Start tinkering with the climate and the people who lost crops are going to start insisting they get compensation and help, and globally we aren't anything like organized to handle it...do we care whose crops get devastated, or that the Amazon rain forest burns? We care---but have we got the mechanisms to figure how bad that is and whether there's an offset in the system.
__________________
Sk8r

"Make haste slowly." ---Augustus.

"If anything CAN go wrong, it will, and at the worst possible moment."---St. Murphy.
  #10  
Old 07/15/2007, 06:19 PM
scottras scottras is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 111
Hi BC,

I really think you need to do some more research. That movie I saw recently and if you only know a little about AGW then it can seem pretty convincing. However, not only are most of the "facts" wrong, the one that are correct are presented in the wrong fashion. Once you start digging into the movie it looks pretty ordinary.

If you need a hand with anything to do with the research I am happy to help.
__________________
"An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind." Mahatma Gandhi
  #11  
Old 07/15/2007, 10:30 PM
greenbean36191 greenbean36191 is offline
Soul of a Sailor
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Huntsville/ Auburn, AL
Posts: 7,859
I heard some buzz about this movie earlier this week so I tried to give it an honest chance after this thread showed up, but I couldn't sit through it. In the part I did watch I saw half truths, dishonest representations of graphs, lots of misleading implications, an expert who also denies the health risks of secondhand smoke (and claims to be an expert on that too), and an expert who has since claimed that he was quoted out of context to the point that the meaning of his comments was completely reversed.
__________________
Lanikai, kahakai nani, aloha no au ia 'oe. A hui hou kakou.
  #12  
Old 07/18/2007, 10:51 AM
jeffnsa jeffnsa is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: san antonio,tx
Posts: 82
the scientest on both sides of the argument are being paid to deliver their side, when in fact they are both correct.also add in skaters plate techtonic theory (that is a very interesting theory with merit) and i believe you have the true answere. for anything to happen you have to have multiple items set up and a trigger to initiate it.
  #13  
Old 07/18/2007, 05:18 PM
hankthetank hankthetank is offline
Moved On
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 161
Global warming is inevitable.Rather than whine about how to stop it,which we can't,why don't we whine about how to live with it.
  #14  
Old 07/18/2007, 10:07 PM
chesapeake chesapeake is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 180
i also believe the earth is not doing anything it has not done before the differance is there is about 200 million more vonerable people here then before.
  #15  
Old 07/19/2007, 12:54 AM
scottras scottras is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 111
Quote:
Originally posted by chesapeake
i also believe the earth is not doing anything it has not done before the differance is there is about 200 million more vonerable people here then before.
True, CO2 levels have been higher in the past, but not in last 300,000 years or more.

There are a lot more than 200 million people that will be affected. There are around 6.7 billion people on the planet at the moment.
__________________
"An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind." Mahatma Gandhi
  #16  
Old 07/19/2007, 07:23 PM
greenbean36191 greenbean36191 is offline
Soul of a Sailor
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Huntsville/ Auburn, AL
Posts: 7,859
Quote:
Global warming is inevitable.Rather than whine about how to stop it,which we can't,why don't we whine about how to live with it.
Because we're exacerbating the problem and people aren't the only ones that have to live (or die) with the consequences.
__________________
Lanikai, kahakai nani, aloha no au ia 'oe. A hui hou kakou.
  #17  
Old 07/19/2007, 08:16 PM
Boomstick Boomstick is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cornelius, NC
Posts: 101
Ah, it is True, the world IS flat.......

Anyone who denys that GW is not being accelerated by human activity has their head where the sun don't shine.

Sure there are cycles and natural phenomina, but it is plain, accepted scientific fact that if you pump a ton of C02 into the atmosphere that is not supposed to be there - we will cause a ton of problems.

Sk8r - do me a favour - hook you car exhuast up to your fish tank and run for say an hour - if it is all on nature, then all will be fine and nothing will happen to your reef - let me know how it turns out for ya. If all is fine - then i will stand corrected

As a reefer, seeing the worlds coral reefs decline due to warming ocean temps, rising levels effecting lighting - and pollution killing coral and marine animals, itis sad to me that people in this community are even debating this fact - and yes it is a FACT!
__________________
Live Long and Prosper

Last edited by Boomstick; 07/19/2007 at 08:44 PM.
  #18  
Old 07/19/2007, 08:37 PM
Leilani57 Leilani57 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mooresville, NC
Posts: 126
Fact: 2006 is the warmest year on record.
Fact: 2005 is the second warmest year on record.
Fact: 2007 is already well on it's way to beating 2006 for the record.

Fact: 12 hottest years on record have occured within the last 16 years.

This past winter, european ski resorts faced the warmest winter in 1300 years-- some shut down and had to cancel ski tournaments. Some filed for bankruptcy. Insurance companies are refusing to cover ski resorts below a certain altitude because of global warming.

Daffodils and cherry trees were blooming throughout the northeastern United States on New Year's Day this year.

Atmospheric CO2 concentrations on Earth continue to skyrocket (see graph, below). In fact, we have managed to get them higher than they have ever been in the past 450,000 years. These concentrations have proven to be a linear relationship with temperature over hundreds of thousands of years. This is fact, check the science.




AND THIS.... this graph is Population and Global Warming (CO2 concentration and mean global temperature verses log-population) CO2 concentration (circles) and mean global temperature (squares) plotted relative to their absolute scales, ppm on the left and oC on the right, respectively. Vertical dashed line at 1995.




My degree is in biology, I am a scientist and the scientists of the world have agreed: global warming is caused by humans.

The use of solar energy has not been opened up because the oil industry does not own the sun. ~ Ralph Nader
__________________
Leilani Munter | Driver of the #57 Indy Pro Series SMART Papers Dallara
Running for 2008 Indy Pro Series Rookie of the Year
Shoot for the moon, even if you miss you'll land among the stars...
  #19  
Old 07/19/2007, 08:44 PM
christa christa is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Posts: 118
I am one of those that still doesn't know what to believe. I just don't know facts anymore because the media is all about their agenda. I am torn because I am not a scientist.
  #20  
Old 07/19/2007, 08:51 PM
Boomstick Boomstick is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cornelius, NC
Posts: 101
Quote:
Originally posted by christa
I am one of those that still doesn't know what to believe. I just don't know facts anymore because the media is all about their agenda. I am torn because I am not a scientist.
Christa - it is not about science, it is about common sense, we are doing something that is not natural, it is 100% man made - mother nature / King Neptune - didn't invent the car or make CO2 spewing factories.
In fact mother nature grew trees - and we cut them down for farms and urban sprawl
And King Neptune made fish, plankton and Algae and we over fish and pollute to kill them.

Forget the politics, forget about the media and forget the science, just think about the common scenes of what we are doing and how it is not natural.
__________________
Live Long and Prosper
  #21  
Old 07/19/2007, 08:54 PM
Leilani57 Leilani57 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mooresville, NC
Posts: 126
Quote:
Originally posted by Boomstick
As a reefer, seeing the worlds coral reefs decline due to warming ocean temps, rising levels effecting lighting - and pollution killing coral and marine animals, itis sad to me that people in this community are even debating this fact - and yes it is a FACT!
i agree. the sad thing is at the rate that the temperatures are rising, more and more reefs are going to bleach and it is an extremely sad reality that in not too many years lots of the species in our tanks will exist only there, in our tanks. as an avid scuba diver, the thought of this is crushing.

time is ticking: NASA Scientist: "We have a very brief window of opportunity to act"
__________________
Leilani Munter | Driver of the #57 Indy Pro Series SMART Papers Dallara
Running for 2008 Indy Pro Series Rookie of the Year
Shoot for the moon, even if you miss you'll land among the stars...
  #22  
Old 07/19/2007, 08:54 PM
Sk8r Sk8r is offline
Team RC Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 12,245
I never said that tossing the carbon storage of the Jurassic into the atmosphere in the last dozen decades was benign. However, the discovery of the process of 'charcoaling', which became a major industry in Europe in the middle ages [all those guys living in cottages in the woods in fairy tales] stripped a lot of trees out of the picture and produced a lot of woodsmoke, on an industrial level, and prior to that was the population rise in Europe and Asia that took axes to the forests and slash and burned the forests of 2 continents, among other carbon disasters of the post-glaciation period, plus Thera, and several volcanic disasters---none of these alone was capable of pulling the trigger: try as we would, we could't wreck the atmosphere, but we could shove the big rock a little further toward the downhill skid. What I'm saying is that the turnaround can be fast, it can be difficult to deal with, and there are things we can do about it---possibly. Or possibly not. We could use more research, but that's not going on, on any large scale. The fact is that points rack up both on the side of the 'natural causes' people and on the side of the 'its all our fault' people---and everybody's so busy lining up on their 'side' we haven't yet accepted that we ought to be doing anything in an organized way to deal with the result of it.
__________________
Sk8r

"Make haste slowly." ---Augustus.

"If anything CAN go wrong, it will, and at the worst possible moment."---St. Murphy.
  #23  
Old 07/19/2007, 09:03 PM
billsreef billsreef is offline
Moderator
10 & Over Club
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 12,688
Christa,

One of the things that long ago convinced me that we could indeed have an impact on the atmosphere was not science, but offshore cruising. Going far offshore (I'm talking over the edge of the continental shelf) the air pollution over major cities becomes very apparent. It shows as on obvious thick yellow/brown haze over the location of the city. Far enough offshore that no land is in sight, yet you can precisely pin point the location of a city from the haze. It's very hard to look such obvious pollution and think we're not having an effect with our air pollution. And that's without looking at scientific data or publications, or even the media.
__________________
Bill

"LOL, well I have no brain apparently. " - dc (Debi)
  #24  
Old 07/19/2007, 09:16 PM
christa christa is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Posts: 118
Yes, you all make me think and have great input. The thought of our coral reefs dieing off is what made me really think about this over the past year. That just breaks my heart. It is very interesting reading everyone's thoughts on this. I think I might represent alot of people who are confused about this issue. Thanks for all the valuable information.
  #25  
Old 07/19/2007, 10:07 PM
HippieSmell HippieSmell is offline
I hug trees, not Bushes
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 2,613
Quote:
Originally posted by Sk8r
I never said that tossing the carbon storage of the Jurassic into the atmosphere in the last dozen decades was benign. However, the discovery of the process of 'charcoaling', which became a major industry in Europe in the middle ages [all those guys living in cottages in the woods in fairy tales] stripped a lot of trees out of the picture and produced a lot of woodsmoke, on an industrial level, and prior to that was the population rise in Europe and Asia that took axes to the forests and slash and burned the forests of 2 continents, among other carbon disasters of the post-glaciation period, plus Thera, and several volcanic disasters---none of these alone was capable of pulling the trigger: try as we would, we could't wreck the atmosphere, but we could shove the big rock a little further toward the downhill skid. What I'm saying is that the turnaround can be fast, it can be difficult to deal with, and there are things we can do about it---possibly. Or possibly not. We could use more research, but that's not going on, on any large scale. The fact is that points rack up both on the side of the 'natural causes' people and on the side of the 'its all our fault' people---and everybody's so busy lining up on their 'side' we haven't yet accepted that we ought to be doing anything in an organized way to deal with the result of it.
An important thing to remember about burning trees is that if you let the trees grow back, it's essentially carbon neutral. The same massive deforestation that happened in the US during the 1800's is why they think the US is actually a carbon sink . Oil, on the other hand, is much different because it doesn't renew nearly as fast as plants.

Also, I'm curious as to why you don't think there's any research going on?
__________________
The Sand People are easily startled, but they will soon be back, and in greater numbers.

All statements have been peer reviewed.
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef Central™ Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2009