Reef Central Online Community

Home Forum Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences View New Posts View Today's Posts

Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Search Reefkeeping ...an online magazine for marine aquarists Support our sponsors and mention Reef Central

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community Archives > General Interest Forums > The Reef Chemistry Forum
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04/07/2006, 09:09 AM
Nathan Nathan is offline
Senior Specialist
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Newtown, Pa., USA
Posts: 1,460
Strontium: Isn't it Radioactive?

I do remember hearing about Strontium during the Chernobyl nuclear accident in the 80's. But maybe we are using a different isotope of Stronium that is not radioactive in our tanks. I am not really too well versed in that part of chemistry, but it would be interesting to know more about how Strontium works.

-Nathan
  #2  
Old 04/07/2006, 09:17 AM
Randy Holmes-Farley Randy Holmes-Farley is offline
Reef Chemist
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Arlington, Massachusetts
Posts: 52,068
There are different isotopes of strontium. The normal ones in seawater are not radioactive. They vary with different numbers of neutrons in the nucleus.

The isotopes and percentage in seawater are:

Sr88 82.56%
Sr86 9.86%
Sr87 9.02%
Sr84 0.56%

The primary radioactive one is Sr90.
It has a half life of 28 years.
__________________
Randy Holmes-Farley
  #3  
Old 04/07/2006, 10:12 AM
capt. insano capt. insano is offline
Huh???
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Whats the matter w/ KS?
Posts: 1,271
I was wondering why I was growing that pesky 6th finger and tail!!
__________________
"I pity the fool"
"You're talking a whole lotta Jibba-Jabba."
  #4  
Old 04/07/2006, 10:24 AM
Nathan Nathan is offline
Senior Specialist
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Newtown, Pa., USA
Posts: 1,460
Ahhhh... thanks for the refresher. It's amazing what one small change to an atom can do!

capt. insano,

  #5  
Old 04/07/2006, 10:26 AM
Randy Holmes-Farley Randy Holmes-Farley is offline
Reef Chemist
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Arlington, Massachusetts
Posts: 52,068


Happy Reefing.
__________________
Randy Holmes-Farley
  #6  
Old 04/07/2006, 01:34 PM
spidey07 spidey07 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 563
Quote:
Originally posted by Randy Holmes-Farley
There are different isotopes of strontium. The normal ones in seawater are not radioactive. They vary with different numbers of neutrons in the nucleus.

The isotopes and percentage in seawater are:

Sr88 82.56%
Sr86 9.86%
Sr87 9.02%
Sr84 0.56%

The primary radioactive one is Sr90.
It has a half life of 28 years.
28 years!

Yikes. sounds like some dangerous stuff. spitting out particles left and right.
  #7  
Old 04/07/2006, 02:08 PM
Nathan Nathan is offline
Senior Specialist
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Newtown, Pa., USA
Posts: 1,460
If the half life is 28 years, then it must only be spitting out a very tiny amount of radiation, right? I would think that the shorter the half-life, the more dangerous because it "spits out particles" at a much faster rate.

Am I on the right track or am I totally wrong?

-Nathan
  #8  
Old 04/08/2006, 01:00 PM
spidey07 spidey07 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 563
nathan,

It's been a long time since chemistry so hopefully Randy can correct me...

A half-life of 28 years is VERY short. Many other elements are in the 10s of thousands of years. The very heavy radioative elements like plutonium and uranium have relatively short half lifes under 100 years depending on the isotope (number of neutrons in the nuclues)

so having such a short half-life means it is spitting out particles at a rate greater than something with a "longer" half-life. these particles/waves are termed alpha, beta and gamma radiation. I forget which ones are really bad. I think alpha can penetrate inches of lead.

All elements go through radioactive decay AFAIK.

I hope I didn't muck up the facts too much.
  #9  
Old 04/08/2006, 03:39 PM
Randy Holmes-Farley Randy Holmes-Farley is offline
Reef Chemist
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Arlington, Massachusetts
Posts: 52,068
While generally true that the longer the half life the less radiation, it also depends on how much of the actual radioisotope you have to begin with. A small amount (in grams or teaspoons) can still be incredibly radioactive and deadly.
__________________
Randy Holmes-Farley
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef Central™ Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2009