Reef Central Online Community

Home Forum Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences View New Posts View Today's Posts

Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Search Reefkeeping ...an online magazine for marine aquarists Support our sponsors and mention Reef Central

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community Archives > General Interest Forums > Lighting, Filtration & Other Equipment

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12/16/2007, 06:58 PM
tizzy tizzy is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Miami
Posts: 52
Too little UV light?

I read an article in the 2007 annual of Marine Fish and Reef stating modern reefkeepers have successfully duplicated the colors and intensity of natural light, but we have failed to duplicate UV.

Since UV light naturally penetrates the first 10 feet of the ocean where the most colorful corals are found, why do we not apply the same technology in our tanks (99% of which are shallower than 10 feet in depth)?

I know hqi bulbs have to be covered because of their strength, but we should be able to use a medium wattage uv (e.g. tanning) bulb without harm. Has anyone researched this and found the appropriate watts/gal UV?
  #2  
Old 12/16/2007, 07:20 PM
JC VT JC VT is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Posts: 533
Quote:
Since UV light naturally penetrates the first 10 feet of the ocean where the most colorful corals are found
I've heard the opposite actually; most of the more colorful corals tend to come from deeper than 10 feet.
  #3  
Old 12/17/2007, 04:53 PM
tizzy tizzy is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Miami
Posts: 52
UV can certainly harm...or kill, but most research seems to be based on UV-B exposure. More harmful UV-B rays (wavelength 315-280 nm) are strongest during the midday hours, but less harmful UV-A rays (400-315 nm) are equal in intensity throughout the entire day of sunlight exposure.

UV-A has a greater penetration power in water than UV-B or visible light, and there is even evidence that UV-A may actually help to photorepair the damage caused by UV-B radiation.

That's about the depth of my UV knowledge, so I'll defer to wiser men or even wiser women.

Any input would be schweet.
  #4  
Old 12/17/2007, 04:58 PM
hahnmeister hahnmeister is offline
El Jefe de WRS
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Brew City, WI
Posts: 8,639
There are a few corals that benefit from UV-A... FEW. I talked about this at length with Dana Riddle in the past, and the thing is, UV-A even is so easy to overload a coral (photoinhibit) with that its just not worth it. That, and it turns out that the UV output of most halide bulbs (SE or DE w/ sheild) is beyond what natural conditions provide, AND we arent keeping our corals in as much water depth... so if anything, we should be concerned about making too much UV it seems.
__________________
"If at first, the idea is not absurd, then there is no hope for it"
-Al Einstein
  #5  
Old 12/18/2007, 10:40 PM
tizzy tizzy is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Miami
Posts: 52
makes sense

I haven't seen any studies done in the non-visible output of haides, so I'll defer to you.
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef Central™ Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2009