Reef Central Online Community

Home Forum Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences View New Posts View Today's Posts

Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Search Reefkeeping ...an online magazine for marine aquarists Support our sponsors and mention Reef Central

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community Archives > Special Interest Group (SIG) Forums > Large Reef Tanks
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #101  
Old 01/17/2007, 02:36 PM
JB NY JB NY is offline
cnidarian vigilante
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 7,083
Hmm I'm not sure I know why drilling it would be a bad idea. They have the drill it for the overflows, what does 5 more holes matter?

I never really thought drilling in the bottom would be a big deal. I guess I'll have to search for some problems people had when doing this.
__________________
-Joe
  #102  
Old 01/17/2007, 02:40 PM
cali_reef cali_reef is offline
Got frags??
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Mineola, NY
Posts: 2,735
Holy swiss cheese

Are they using 1 inch glass for the bottom?

I would go with a two inch close loop intake or a second 1.5 inch intake, the Sequence ReeFlo series pumps have 2 inch intake.
My Oceans Motions' 4 way does not like sand or any type of debris, more than a few people I know have the issue with sand binding the internal drum. Having the close loop intake facing up wards will only further exaggerate this problem.
  #103  
Old 01/17/2007, 02:52 PM
pecan2phat pecan2phat is offline
Paracentropyge Boyeli
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wallingford, CT
Posts: 2,191
The only problem that I can visualize with drilling on the bottom without an over flow box is that if you have a bulkhead or fitting failure, you would need to drain the entire tank to repair this.

I think that the larger Reeflo pumps might only have a 1.5" intake as oppsed to the Dart and Snapper.
  #104  
Old 01/17/2007, 03:05 PM
ckuhndog77 ckuhndog77 is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: DC/Metro
Posts: 348
JB, here is my .02.

I got a somewhat custom 215 oceanic drilled on bottom w/ 4 holes for closed loop. My advice, have the holes drilled so you can use the heavy duty bulkheads. Mine drilled only for regular. So far no issues, but HD bulkhead nuts have more threads and will hold better. No matter what, just use caution when adjusting any fittings under there once tank is full so that you don't cause a fitting to drip. About 11 months on my system and no drips so far.

Here is the thread I started for CL on bottom. Other threads out there as well.
http://archive.reefcentral.com/forum...highlight=loop

use a true union ball valve from savko on each one and threaded bulkhead. If you have to change something, you can insert plug on inside of tank or you have union on ball valve to close as well.

Alberto did have some good comments on p2 of linked thread. No loss of sleep so far for me

Good luck dude.
Craig
WAMAS President
__________________
Craig

Allegheny College 1990 Div. III National Champs - Football (I was starting Left OT)
  #105  
Old 01/17/2007, 03:07 PM
Zoom Zoom is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: SNJ
Posts: 5,471
Quote:
Originally posted by JB NY
Hmm I'm not sure I know why drilling it would be a bad idea. They have the drill it for the overflows, what does 5 more holes matter?

I never really thought drilling in the bottom would be a big deal. I guess I'll have to search for some problems people had when doing this.
The holes for the overflows are not in the weak part of the tanks bottom glass, the more you move to the middle of the bottom glass the more prone for a disaster.
__________________
Steve .
  #106  
Old 01/17/2007, 03:08 PM
twinreef twinreef is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: nyc
Posts: 258
Joe are u going BB or DSB. i might be ordering my tank from them also late FEB. or March.
  #107  
Old 01/17/2007, 03:12 PM
JB NY JB NY is offline
cnidarian vigilante
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 7,083
Quote:
Originally posted by cali_reef
Holy swiss cheese

Are they using 1 inch glass for the bottom?

I would go with a two inch close loop intake or a second 1.5 inch intake, the Sequence ReeFlo series pumps have 2 inch intake.
My Oceans Motions' 4 way does not like sand or any type of debris, more than a few people I know have the issue with sand binding the internal drum. Having the close loop intake facing up wards will only further exaggerate this problem.
3/4" for the bottom.

I'll probably put the intake on an elbow so it is not facing up, thinking it might create a little vortex if it is facing up.

Hmm, if the sand is a problem for the OM, I'll just have to make a decision no sand or no OM. I'm thinking of ditching the sand right now anyway. looks like it is limiting me too much right now
__________________
-Joe
  #108  
Old 01/17/2007, 03:13 PM
ckuhndog77 ckuhndog77 is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: DC/Metro
Posts: 348
Quote:
Originally posted by Zoom
The holes for the overflows are not in the weak part of the tanks bottom glass, the more you move to the middle of the bottom glass the more prone for a disaster.
Zoom, If he gets AO (aquarium obsessed) tank, don't they suggest that you install tank on sheet of foam supported by stand under tank? Outside small holes drilled in stand for plumbing, I think entire bottom would be supported, no? Trying to remember how Sanjay's is on the bottom and if glass rests on foam or if it's just frame that does.

page 15 of sanjay's thread is best I could find on quick scan of empty tank shots: http://archive.reefcentral.com/forum...&pagenumber=15 but hard to tell if glass sits on foam.
__________________
Craig

Allegheny College 1990 Div. III National Champs - Football (I was starting Left OT)
  #109  
Old 01/17/2007, 03:18 PM
JB NY JB NY is offline
cnidarian vigilante
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 7,083
Quote:
Originally posted by pecan2phat
The only problem that I can visualize with drilling on the bottom without an over flow box is that if you have a bulkhead or fitting failure, you would need to drain the entire tank to repair this.
.
I've never had a failure with any of my bulkheads, ever. So maybe that is giving me a false sense of security.

Quote:
Originally posted by ckuhndog77
JB, here is my .02.

I got a somewhat custom 215 oceanic drilled on bottom w/ 4 holes for closed loop. My advice, have the holes drilled so you can use the heavy duty bulkheads. Mine drilled only for regular. So far no issues, but HD bulkhead nuts have more threads and will hold better. No matter what, just use caution when adjusting any fittings under there once tank is full so that you don't cause a fitting to drip. About 11 months on my system and no drips so far.

use a true union ball valve from savko on each one and threaded bulkhead. If you have to change something, you can insert plug on inside of tank or you have union on ball valve to close as well.

Alberto did have some good comments on p2 of linked thread. No loss of sleep so far for me

Good luck dude.
Craig
WAMAS President
Thanks for the info. Yeah, I only use savko true unions now. I used to use the Home Depot ones and had nothing but problems with them as time when on. When I re-did my sump room 3 years ago I redid all the ball values with savko true unions. So much easier to work with and replace if needed. I'll check out the thread you linked to, thanks!
__________________
-Joe
  #110  
Old 01/17/2007, 03:20 PM
JB NY JB NY is offline
cnidarian vigilante
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 7,083
Quote:
Originally posted by ckuhndog77
Zoom, If he gets AO (aquarium obsessed) tank, don't they suggest that you install tank on sheet of foam supported by stand under tank? Outside small holes drilled in stand for plumbing, I think entire bottom would be supported, no? Trying to remember how Sanjay's is on the bottom and if glass rests on foam or if it's just frame that does.
I did this on my last tank. 5 years and no problems. I actually have a ton of left over foam, so doing this would not be a problem.
__________________
-Joe
  #111  
Old 01/17/2007, 04:38 PM
cali_reef cali_reef is offline
Got frags??
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Mineola, NY
Posts: 2,735
Quote:
Originally posted by pecan2phat
I think that the larger Reeflo pumps might only have a 1.5" intake as oppsed to the Dart and Snapper.
You are right, I assumed he would use a Dart or Snapper since those two are the ones I think are the best CL pump for a tank that size.
  #112  
Old 01/17/2007, 04:44 PM
tacocat tacocat is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,266
Quote:
Originally posted by JB NY
Thanks for the info. Yeah, I only use savko true unions now. I used to use the Home Depot ones and had nothing but problems with them as time when on. When I re-did my sump room 3 years ago I redid all the ball values with savko true unions. So much easier to work with and replace if needed. I'll check out the thread you linked to, thanks!
You're referring to the Georg Fischer ones correct? They work well. The 2" one is a bit tougher to unscrew than the others because the machine tolerance is so tight, but yeah, they work great. The ball action is smooth
__________________
I refrain from using the word "hobby". You don't refer to your dog or cat as a "hobby."
  #113  
Old 01/17/2007, 05:12 PM
Zoom Zoom is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: SNJ
Posts: 5,471
Quote:
Originally posted by ckuhndog77
Zoom, If he gets AO (aquarium obsessed) tank, don't they suggest that you install tank on sheet of foam supported by stand under tank? Outside small holes drilled in stand for plumbing, I think entire bottom would be supported, no? Trying to remember how Sanjay's is on the bottom and if glass rests on foam or if it's just frame that does.

page 15 of sanjay's thread is best I could find on quick scan of empty tank shots: http://archive.reefcentral.com/forum...&pagenumber=15 but hard to tell if glass sits on foam.
I saw the way Sanjay's tank is built and will be no problem putting holes on the bottom of that tank.
I don't know how AO built there tanks if they look similar to the acrylic tanks or a glass tanks without any trim that will be ok i just don't like to see anything like this happen to Joes tank.
http://archive.reefcentral.com/forum...5&pagenumber=1
__________________
Steve .
  #114  
Old 01/17/2007, 05:30 PM
dlshaw dlshaw is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 25
Is it wise to drill the EuroBracing? Isn't it there for structural integrity of the tank overall? I'd hate to see your tank fail because of a few 1" holes in your bracing
  #115  
Old 01/17/2007, 06:44 PM
AcroSteve AcroSteve is offline
Skeet, Skeet, Skeet
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Sitting on a corn flake
Posts: 4,213
I too would opt for 2" on the CL intake. Or at least double 1-1/2" joined together into a 2".

The best suited, high flow, low head pumps have 2" inlets.
__________________
****************
Get crazy with the cheez whiz...

I didn't mean to take up all your sweet time
Give it right back to you....One of these days
  #116  
Old 01/17/2007, 07:23 PM
JB NY JB NY is offline
cnidarian vigilante
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 7,083
I can do 2" intake.

dlshaw I originally thought the same thing, but tons of people do it and the manufactures say there is no problem with it.
__________________
-Joe
  #117  
Old 01/17/2007, 07:47 PM
tacocat tacocat is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,266
Quote:
Originally posted by dlshaw
Is it wise to drill the EuroBracing? Isn't it there for structural integrity of the tank overall? I'd hate to see your tank fail because of a few 1" holes in your bracing
People do it all the time. If glass were more elastic like acrylic, than there would be some cause for concern.
2" would be the way to go. One can always downsize it with fittings.

I'd use one of these intakes as well.
http://www.bestnest.com/bestnest/RTP...?SKU=CAP-TS1.5

You should be able to find one for less than $10 either online or locally. These prefilters are the most invert safe I have used.
__________________
I refrain from using the word "hobby". You don't refer to your dog or cat as a "hobby."
  #118  
Old 01/18/2007, 10:52 AM
JB NY JB NY is offline
cnidarian vigilante
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 7,083
After some talk with AO. I think I am going to ditch the CL. They would rather not have me put 5 more holes in the bottom, and I don't have the room for the CL out the back. I think using streams I should be able to get more than enough flow.
__________________
-Joe
  #119  
Old 01/18/2007, 11:04 AM
RGibson RGibson is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Burlington NC
Posts: 1,868
Joe how many streams will it take and what model will you used?
__________________
RGibson
  #120  
Old 01/18/2007, 11:09 AM
JB NY JB NY is offline
cnidarian vigilante
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 7,083
I'll probably add two 6100 (3170 GPH each) plus the 6000 I already have (1849 GPH), add another 1200 GPH for the return pump should give me about 34x turnove rate.
__________________
-Joe
  #121  
Old 01/18/2007, 11:11 AM
JB NY JB NY is offline
cnidarian vigilante
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 7,083
My old tank had about 16x turnover. That one turned out ok.
__________________
-Joe
  #122  
Old 01/18/2007, 02:05 PM
RGibson RGibson is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Burlington NC
Posts: 1,868
Joe are you going to used the 7095 multicontroller to run the 3 tunze streams?
__________________
RGibson
  #123  
Old 01/18/2007, 02:20 PM
JB NY JB NY is offline
cnidarian vigilante
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 7,083
Quote:
Originally posted by RGibson
Joe are you going to used the 7095 multicontroller to run the 3 tunze streams?
yup
__________________
-Joe
  #124  
Old 01/18/2007, 02:36 PM
twinreef twinreef is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: nyc
Posts: 258
why don't u change the transformer on the 6000 and make it a 6100. there about 75 bucks.
  #125  
Old 01/18/2007, 02:42 PM
JB NY JB NY is offline
cnidarian vigilante
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 7,083
oops I just checked my 6000 and it's really a 6100. So I don't need the transformer but that was a good idea, I didn't know I could do that.
__________________
-Joe
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef Central™ Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2009