Reef Central Online Community

Home Forum Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences View New Posts View Today's Posts

Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Search Reefkeeping ...an online magazine for marine aquarists Support our sponsors and mention Reef Central

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community Archives > Invert and Plant Forums > Tridacnid Clams and other Mollusks
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #26  
Old 02/01/2006, 08:00 AM
Reefcherie Reefcherie is offline
VILP
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 2,557
Do you know what proportion of Reefchili is phytoplankton? From what I understand, the phyto is the only element in Reefchili that Tridacnid clams are likely to utilize, so I would like to share my concern that in a 125-gallon tank, there may not be a high enough concentration of phyto available to these young clams.

While their mantles (especially for the two smallest) are so tiny, they will have little surface area available for photosynthesis, so they are relying much more heavily on direct feeding at this size than they will once they've grown past 3".
__________________
A hundred years from now the world may be different because you were important in the life of a child.
  #27  
Old 02/01/2006, 08:06 AM
sundance1 sundance1 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bedford,PA
Posts: 225
When I feed them,I mix the enough of the food for a 140 gallon tank.I place the clams in a small bowl with the water about 1" over the mantle and feed them in the bowl.After about 20 min. I place the clams back in the tank and feed the tank what's left in the bowl.
  #28  
Old 02/01/2006, 08:13 AM
Reefcherie Reefcherie is offline
VILP
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 2,557
Thanks for explaining further. I misunderstood your intention and thought your announcement meant you had abandoned the idea of bowl feeding. If the proportion of phytoplankton in the Reefchili is high enough, and it is in a form that the young clams can utilize, this could work. I am unfamiliar w/ how well clams utilize spray-dried phytoplankton.... as I've only used home created phyto in its fresh, liquid form.

With the Reefchili in a bowl, can you see a visible difference in the appearance of the water from the time you place the clams in it until you take them out? I always found it reassuring to see that the green tinged water became noticeably clearer as the clams fed.
__________________
A hundred years from now the world may be different because you were important in the life of a child.
  #29  
Old 02/01/2006, 10:47 AM
sundance1 sundance1 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bedford,PA
Posts: 225
Yes,after the 20 min. in the bowl,the water is much clearer(but not TOTALLY clear)than it was when I first put it in.I can see the water moving quite a bit from the clams feeding while they are in the bowl.
  #30  
Old 02/01/2006, 12:13 PM
Barry N. Barry N. is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 385
Quote:
I'd go with 3 times a week if they were mine until they are a little bigger. They don't have large enough mantles yet to meet their food requirements through photosynthesis. Once they hit about 3" feeding really isn't necessary w/ good lighting like yours.
I agree.

IMO, we like to use a live phyto. Phyto-Feast or DT's.

Another thing I would like to add. Maximas and croceas grow the slowest of all the Tridacnids

In our experience the Tridacna maxima is the hardest to keep under 2.5" Tridacna derasa is by far the easiest to keep.
  #31  
Old 02/02/2006, 07:48 AM
CrazyLionfish CrazyLionfish is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: IL
Posts: 1,646
Do you have to bowl feed them? Mine is over 4 inches and I was under the impression that if they're over 3 inches you can just feed the tank instead of target feeding.
__________________
Matt
  #32  
Old 02/02/2006, 07:52 AM
Reefcherie Reefcherie is offline
VILP
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 2,557
Quote:
Originally posted by CrazyLionfish
Do you have to bowl feed them? Mine is over 4 inches and I was under the impression that if they're over 3 inches you can just feed the tank instead of target feeding.
No, you don't need to bowl feed them at that size! With proper lighting, a Tridacnid clam over 3" no longer needs target feeding at all. Their mantle has reached sufficient size/surface area that they are able to meet their needs w/ photosynthesis. That isn't to say that they might not still benefit from phytoplankton feeding within the tank.
__________________
A hundred years from now the world may be different because you were important in the life of a child.
  #33  
Old 02/07/2006, 12:13 PM
sundance1 sundance1 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bedford,PA
Posts: 225
TUESDAYS PIC!!

  #34  
Old 02/14/2006, 10:10 AM
sundance1 sundance1 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bedford,PA
Posts: 225
OK,here is this weeks pic! The date on my camer is wrong,I took this pic thismorning 02/14/2006.
  #35  
Old 02/21/2006, 12:22 PM
sundance1 sundance1 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bedford,PA
Posts: 225
TUESDAYS PICS! 02/21/2006

The clams all seem to be doing well.A little new growth can be seen on all three of them.I am bowl feeding "reef chili" every other day.
  #36  
Old 02/26/2006, 11:35 AM
anglecoral anglecoral is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 113
Quote:
Originally posted by Reefcherie
Do you know what proportion of Reefchili is phytoplankton? From what I understand, the phyto is the only element in Reefchili that Tridacnid clams are likely to utilize, so I would like to share my concern that in a 125-gallon tank, there may not be a high enough concentration of phyto available to these young clams.

While their mantles (especially for the two smallest) are so tiny, they will have little surface area available for photosynthesis, so they are relying much more heavily on direct feeding at this size than they will once they've grown past 3".
actually the clams will prolly also utilize the Artemia nauplii replacement diet. it is the same size as the phyto and contains way more nutrition than even gut loaded phyto.
  #37  
Old 02/28/2006, 05:26 PM
AngelReefer AngelReefer is offline
Moved On
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 116
Nice clams
  #38  
Old 03/01/2006, 10:23 AM
sundance1 sundance1 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bedford,PA
Posts: 225
A day late this week

Here's this weeks pics(a day late)I had court for work yesterday.I quit bowl feeding the Squammy and the Derasa,I will continue to bowl feed the Maxima till it grows some more.
  #39  
Old 03/25/2006, 06:15 PM
sundance1 sundance1 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bedford,PA
Posts: 225
These guys are still going great! Been really busy and haven't had much time lately to take pics,here's some new pics!
  #40  
Old 03/27/2006, 06:33 PM
JmLee JmLee is offline
my member is registered.
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Monterey, California
Posts: 1,533
i bought a 2inch blue maxima about 3 months ago and i dont feed him directly. I dose my tank very lightly about 1-2 times a week with DT phytoplankton and hes growing like crazy.
  #41  
Old 03/28/2006, 10:49 AM
Snprhed Snprhed is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 556
Anybody know what became of the lawsuit of DT's against Phyto?
  #42  
Old 04/01/2006, 04:44 PM
alien9168 alien9168 is offline
Architecture Fanatic
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: "Does it seem like were walking uphill" "a rubix cube"
Posts: 1,659
Nice clams!

I like your squamosa.

-alien
__________________
-Alien
  #43  
Old 04/24/2006, 05:43 PM
Snarkys Snarkys is offline
RC Sponsor
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 3,659
any updates ? still feeding them ?
  #44  
Old 04/24/2006, 11:11 PM
sundance1 sundance1 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bedford,PA
Posts: 225
Yeah,still feeding the reef chili.they are doing fine and are growing.The Maxima is growing slowly though.I been really busy working OT and fishing,but I'll try to get some pics up tomarrow.
  #45  
Old 04/26/2006, 09:35 AM
sundance1 sundance1 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bedford,PA
Posts: 225
Here's some updated pics,still feeding ONLY on reefchili and my lighting.
  #46  
Old 04/26/2006, 09:47 AM
Snarkys Snarkys is offline
RC Sponsor
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 3,659
they look fantastic
  #47  
Old 04/26/2006, 02:33 PM
hairymushroom hairymushroom is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: South Africa
Posts: 315
awesome squamie , makes me feel jealous
  #48  
Old 05/13/2006, 09:42 AM
Snarkys Snarkys is offline
RC Sponsor
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 3,659
So do you think the Reef Chili worked pretty well for feeding the smaller clams ?
  #49  
Old 05/13/2006, 04:04 PM
sundance1 sundance1 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bedford,PA
Posts: 225
I think it is working fine,the maxima is growing slowly though.The Squammy and the Derasa are growing at a good rate though.
  #50  
Old 05/13/2006, 06:13 PM
Kaykay55 Kaykay55 is offline
Moved On
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 0
Very Nice !!
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef Central™ Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2009