Nikon 55-200mm.

edwing206 · #1 04/30/2007, 12:44 AM

I have read some good reviews on this lens. Would it be good for full tank shots, moving fish shots and corals? The only downside that I read about is that is has slow auto focus. And is the VR version really worth the extra $65? I will be using it for my tank and on a tripod so it really isn't worth the extrad cash is it?
Here is the lens. http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/AS...kenrockwellcom

thanks

jedininja · #2 04/30/2007, 12:35 PM

Well I dont know about the lens since i'm a cannon guy, but IMO, VR/IS is defiantly worth it anytime you take handheld shots.

edwing206 · #3 04/30/2007, 03:08 PM

Ok. Thanks jedininja.
Any Nikon users have experience with this lens?
thanks

jet_jer · #4 04/30/2007, 06:31 PM

My copy should be here a a couple days. Hoping to take it to the Zoo this weekend. That and maybe a 24-120mm VR as well.

Jer

edwing206 · #5 04/30/2007, 08:02 PM

Cool. Be sure to post how you like it.

RCBruce · #6 05/02/2007, 10:31 AM

I am a nikon person in addition to camera store manager and 16 year photographer.
ANY nikon lens is worth the money as nikon glass is the very best. I think all the hoopla created about VR lenses is unneccessary and is just a status symbol among those using cameras as jewelry these days, but if you got money to burn, go for it!

edwing206 · #7 05/02/2007, 10:38 AM

Wiil it work for tank shots?
Pics of moving fish or do I need a different lens?
thanks

jet_jer · #8 05/02/2007, 08:26 PM

I recieved the lense today but immediatley sent it back as I decided to pay up for the 70-300 VR as I heard and read some ver good things about it. That one comes tomorrow - I'll post pics as I learn about it.

Jer

edwing206 · #9 05/02/2007, 09:09 PM

Sweet. Be sure to post pic with it.
thanks