Reef Central Online Community

Home Forum Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences View New Posts View Today's Posts

Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Search Reefkeeping ...an online magazine for marine aquarists Support our sponsors and mention Reef Central

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community Archives > Coral Forums > LPS Keepers
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12/03/2004, 11:07 AM
haid haid is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: IN
Posts: 517
LPS harder than SPS??

Why is everyone always saying SPS are so hard to keep? I have an SPS tank and a LPS tank. By far the SPS are easier to take care of. High flow and light and they grow like crazy. They can take falls, don't get ripped. Anyway just my opion but LPS's are the toughest to keep(and continue to grow/frag). What are you opinions?
  #2  
Old 12/03/2004, 11:38 AM
milhouse74 milhouse74 is offline
Custodial Dad :)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Sandy Springs, GA
Posts: 1,675
Toughest how, on the budget then SPS wins hands down.
__________________
You said there'd be fudgicles Bart. Where's the fudgicles?
  #3  
Old 12/03/2004, 11:55 AM
milhouse74 milhouse74 is offline
Custodial Dad :)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Sandy Springs, GA
Posts: 1,675
Okay, some secondary thoughts:

I think a lot of the reason people say SPS is harder is because a lot of people put more on their SPS tanks then LPS folks. Ca reactors, multiple skimmers, MH lighting, and on and on.

Then suppliments, my LPS I only use B*Ionic. I know a lot of SPS people that use every magic potion or snake oil on the market.

Also with my LPS, I can tell something is off in the tank way before it crashes, because the corals have so much more life to them, and react to it so much more. With SPS I would never know unless I tested for it, or it was probably too late.

David
__________________
You said there'd be fudgicles Bart. Where's the fudgicles?
  #4  
Old 12/03/2004, 12:05 PM
haid haid is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: IN
Posts: 517
I just meant in terms of getting growth and keeping the corals happy. I run my systems tied together through a basement sump. I actually have a leather only tank, SPS, LPS and seahoarse tank. I use a calcium reactor/big skimmer but that is about it. I control most everything through water changes. It just seems to me that LPS are a lot more nitch orientated, you have to have just the right flow and light for each species. Where as SPS just MASS flow and MASS light and the things are growing like crazy. I have obtained most of my SPS through Aquacultured frags though so maybe I only have species that are proven in aquaria. I have a much harder time keeping all the LPS happy and not stinging each other than I do in the SPS tank.(although it is not as full yet either). Just in my opinion I don't believe SPS to be any harder to keep then LPS. You make a good point about seeing the corals react to stress though.
  #5  
Old 12/04/2004, 04:19 PM
redFishblue redFishblue is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 607
I hear what you're saying. Once a tank is set up for sps, it's not as difficult keeping them alive as some people think.
But the difficulty in acros is getting really nice color out of them instead of brown sticks.
__________________
it's always darkest before it's totally black

Last edited by redFishblue; 12/04/2004 at 04:38 PM.
  #6  
Old 12/05/2004, 12:23 PM
davejnz davejnz is offline
Moved On
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Daytona Beach,FL
Posts: 1,248
Agreed,but SPS are more likely to SDR,RTN,bleaching,acclimation problems,temp swings,etc.. than LPS.I disagree that all SPS need is high-light,high flow environment to thrive..I have acro's that do best on the SB with mod/random current.Not all SPS are collected from the crest and upper slope.Your SPS growth is great but remember SPS generally grow a lot faster than LPS.I think that both types present a challenge in husbandry but my LPS tank is by far my simplest,easiest to maintain.
  #7  
Old 12/05/2004, 12:25 PM
Flanders Flanders is offline
I have no catchy title
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 2,696
They're both challenging in their own ways I think. With the advances reefkeeping has made I wouldn't consider it more difficult to keep sps than lps anymore.
__________________
Insert witty phrase, followed by explosive laughter
  #8  
Old 12/05/2004, 06:12 PM
brahm brahm is offline
Moved On
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mammoth Lakes, CA
Posts: 2,458
lps are cake, 10 gallon tank, some pc's, a small powerhead.. and a little food.
  #9  
Old 12/05/2004, 08:24 PM
milhouse74 milhouse74 is offline
Custodial Dad :)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Sandy Springs, GA
Posts: 1,675
Anything is cake with the right equiptment was the point. Hard part of SPS is the wallet it seems.

By the way I keep SPS with a 20 gallon, 2 powerheads, a heater, 250W HM HQI, and thats it. Growing nice too. Only difference is cost really.
__________________
You said there'd be fudgicles Bart. Where's the fudgicles?
  #10  
Old 12/05/2004, 11:28 PM
brahm brahm is offline
Moved On
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mammoth Lakes, CA
Posts: 2,458
my sps tank is a 29 gallon, before it was a 20. It's alot harder.. I mean 250w over a little tank with massive flow, my evapartion rate is huge.. I loose more acros then lps.. lps at least looks bad before it dies, acro you go to the bathroom come back and you have a white stick.
  #11  
Old 12/06/2004, 12:44 AM
s13silvia s13silvia is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,788
Quote:
Originally posted by brahm
lps at least looks bad before it dies, acro you go to the bathroom come back and you have a white stick.
i couldn't agree more... with LPS, i can put them in the tank and now worry about them dying on me, but my SPS i have to watch out like a hawk over them. i recently lost 4 sps frags through a zeo mistake i made..in the same time my lps look great
__________________
Nam
  #12  
Old 12/06/2004, 04:00 AM
bluereefs bluereefs is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Croatia,island Rab
Posts: 1,800
Every year is imported about milions of LPS corals and probably 90 % of them die,SPS corals are imported in much much less numbers and loot of them survive,sps corals actually have much better survivale procent.
There is one thing what you can make with sps corals and what you cant do with the lps,if your sps corals get disease you can frag him and save it,that is almost imposiblle with the lps corals.
Majority of LPS are much more dificult to keep then sps.SPS corals in nature is more like weed,they grow and reproduce fast.
Is more dificult to create right enviroment(circulation particulary) for lps then for sps.
  #13  
Old 12/06/2004, 12:30 PM
wrasstaman wrasstaman is offline
Awaiting Email Confirmation
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 391
Haid,
For me I asked myself, what is my oldest surviving coral? A poll would most likely give you an idication btw! My hammer coral and green star polyps are my first and they are both still alive! They have endured plenty, trust me! I have had to move the tank a few times, also have had a crash or two...but these 2 have taken all the abuse that the sps couldn't come close to tolerating. This may be in part because most LPS are found in more turbid parts of the reef.
Wrassta
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef Central™ Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2009