Reef Central Online Community

Home Forum Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences View New Posts View Today's Posts

Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Search Reefkeeping ...an online magazine for marine aquarists Support our sponsors and mention Reef Central

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community Archives > General Interest Forums > New to the Hobby
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07/27/2007, 12:40 PM
Nanz Nanz is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 408
Raising Calcium

Im having problems raising calcium in my tank. I have a 75 gal tank with a 25 gallon sump. I am using Seachem saltmix and my Alkalinity is 2.5 and my Calcium is 330. I have tried raising it with Seachem Reef Complete but the ammount I need to add to bring up calcium to 400 is more than they recommend dosing in a day.. So I put 10ml in the tank each evening and don't notice any increas in daily testing.

Please help if you can.
  #2  
Old 07/27/2007, 12:45 PM
Shooter7 Shooter7 is offline
Send money....
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Troy, IL - near St. Louis
Posts: 6,056
Here is a link to the reef chemistry calculator. If you click on the "pick a product" part, it gives you a whole listing of various things that can be used to dose to increase calcium, along with how much to use. You can also search around in the chemistry forum for threads and articles relating to reef chemistry. It sounds as though you're going to have to figure out a Ca replacement regimen as your tank is using it up as fast as you put it in at the amounts you're using now. Here's the link:

http://home.comcast.net/~jdieck1/chem_calc3.html
__________________
Dave
  #3  
Old 07/27/2007, 12:53 PM
Nanz Nanz is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 408
Im not sure I understand that calculator. When I plug in the values 100gal volume, Ca : 330 and Ca: 400 and select Seachem complete it says my balance Alk is 1.96 I thought I wanted to have Alk never go below 2.5? Im kinda lost here because no matter what I dose it does not seem to have an effect. I dont want to overdose but then again I don't hav anything in my tank but sond and live rock.
  #4  
Old 07/27/2007, 12:55 PM
capn_hylinur capn_hylinur is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 4,582
Here is a great article plus graphs and charts that should help:

http://web.archive.org/web/200211270...v2002/chem.htm
__________________
"evrr bean to sea Billy--evrr smelled a fish?" "Aye capn..experience is the best teacher"
  #5  
Old 07/27/2007, 01:19 PM
Nanz Nanz is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 408
Quote:
Originally posted by capn_hylinur
Here is a great article plus graphs and charts that should help:

http://web.archive.org/web/200211270...v2002/chem.htm
I have read that article.. What I dont understand is if I want my Ca to be 400 then why does the calc say the balance Alk is 1.96 when this document says:

Quote:
Alkalinity:
2.5 - 4 meq/L or 7 - 11 dKH or 125 - 200 ppm CaCO3 equivalents

Calcium:
380 - 450 ppm calcium ion or 950 - 1125 ppm CaCO3 equivalents

I know Im in Zone 3 but how can I dose that much calcium without lowering the Alk? If I dose the system with the recommended amount how much do I dose in one day?
  #6  
Old 07/27/2007, 01:57 PM
rhino509 rhino509 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: spokane,wa
Posts: 391
first thing first,you should test magnesium just to make sure its in range,if its not it will make getting cal and alk balanced right difficult.just my thoughts.
  #7  
Old 07/27/2007, 02:01 PM
Sk8r Sk8r is offline
Team RC Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 12,245
Ditto on the mg test: if it's 3x the proper cal reading---420 for the cal---meaning 1260 for the mg---then it will enable your alk and cal to stay up. Think of it as a three-legged stool: will collapse if any leg is missing. Mg doesn't skitter around as fast as alk and cal, but definitely needful.
__________________
Sk8r

"Make haste slowly." ---Augustus.

"If anything CAN go wrong, it will, and at the worst possible moment."---St. Murphy.
  #8  
Old 07/27/2007, 02:12 PM
cobra2326 cobra2326 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 75
Edit: please remove.
  #9  
Old 07/27/2007, 02:28 PM
Nanz Nanz is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 408
Quote:
Originally posted by Sk8r
Ditto on the mg test: if it's 3x the proper cal reading---420 for the cal---meaning 1260 for the mg---then it will enable your alk and cal to stay up. Think of it as a three-legged stool: will collapse if any leg is missing. Mg doesn't skitter around as fast as alk and cal, but definitely needful.
That may be the problem.. Mg is 800.. Should I try to correct Mg first or should I try to correct all 3 at the same time? Mg, Ca and Alk
  #10  
Old 07/27/2007, 02:45 PM
MusMusculus MusMusculus is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 206
High pH will also make it hard to raise calcium and alk. Try to keep yours lights-on pH around 8.5 or so to avoid precipitation.
  #11  
Old 07/27/2007, 02:47 PM
Shooter7 Shooter7 is offline
Send money....
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Troy, IL - near St. Louis
Posts: 6,056
Do the Mg first and then see how things balance out. I started getting coral damage in my tank recently and finally did a barrage of tests and Mg came out at 990. You can use that calculator again to tell you how much and how fast of whatever you use to supplement. After you get that up to par, then test the other levels and recalculate.
__________________
Dave
  #12  
Old 07/27/2007, 02:53 PM
Nanz Nanz is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 408
Quote:
Originally posted by Shooter7
Do the Mg first and then see how things balance out. I started getting coral damage in my tank recently and finally did a barrage of tests and Mg came out at 990. You can use that calculator again to tell you how much and how fast of whatever you use to supplement. After you get that up to par, then test the other levels and recalculate.
Thanks everyone..

My Calcium additive does have Mg in it but it seems to be not enough. I guess I thought it would rise when Ca was added, hehe. My pH is not High in fact its low.. 7.9
  #13  
Old 07/27/2007, 04:03 PM
bertoni bertoni is offline
RC Mod
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Foster City, CA, USA
Posts: 35,743
Ignore the balance part of the calculator. It's just wrong and misleading. I'd correct the magnesium, in 5 doses over 5 days, no more than 100 ppm per day. I'd try correcting the calcium and alkalinity, to reduce any possible stress on the animals, but that might not work. Won't hurt to try, though, if you're using calcium chloride and baking soda.
__________________
Jonathan Bertoni
  #14  
Old 07/27/2007, 04:44 PM
INCEPTION7 INCEPTION7 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 54
I could be mistaken, but a PH of 8.5 is near impossible and also impractical. Use a liquid calcium supplement to slowly raise your calcium, once it is near 400-420 then work on your alkalinity to raise it to the 8-12 DKH area. Remember, although these levels are mutually exclusive, they have a direct effect on one another. Don't shoot for the moon with calcium, I know there are success stories, but a value in the low 400's should do you fine. Also, a PH of 7.9 is fairly low but not urgent. Slowly raise the PH (.1) a day by using buffer and/or creating more surface agitation through powerheads or return pumps.
__________________
You can't recreate the ocean overnight.
  #15  
Old 07/27/2007, 07:00 PM
MusMusculus MusMusculus is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 206
Quote:
Originally posted by INCEPTION7
I could be mistaken, but a PH of 8.5 is near impossible and also impractical. ...
pH 8.5 can be reached during lights-on hours due to removal of C02 by photosynthesis. A pH of 8.5 is about as high as you would want to see as calcium will begin to precipitate in the form of calcium carbonate, reducing both calcium and alkalinity. I did not mean to indicate that 8.5 was preferable, only that it should be the upper limit observed during photosynthetic periods.
  #16  
Old 07/30/2007, 11:38 AM
capn_hylinur capn_hylinur is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 4,582
I make it a habit---correct if I am wrong--to add magnesium every time I add calcium ---I use both Seachem's powders--mix it up in a milk container and add to the sump
I have never come across any documented proof that a high magnesium level is damaging and experts right on this site say that it not part of the measurement of alkalinity test kits.
__________________
"evrr bean to sea Billy--evrr smelled a fish?" "Aye capn..experience is the best teacher"
  #17  
Old 07/30/2007, 11:41 AM
capn_hylinur capn_hylinur is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 4,582
Quote:
Originally posted by INCEPTION7
I could be mistaken, but a PH of 8.5 is near impossible and also impractical. Use a liquid calcium supplement to slowly raise your calcium, once it is near 400-420 then work on your alkalinity to raise it to the 8-12 DKH area. Remember, although these levels are mutually exclusive, they have a direct effect on one another. Don't shoot for the moon with calcium, I know there are success stories, but a value in the low 400's should do you fine. Also, a PH of 7.9 is fairly low but not urgent. Slowly raise the PH (.1) a day by using buffer and/or creating more surface agitation through powerheads or return pumps.
Inception, I have been advised by our great mentors on this site not to use buffers to raise pH because they also raise the alkalinity level---rather to use calcium hydroxide (kalkwasser)
__________________
"evrr bean to sea Billy--evrr smelled a fish?" "Aye capn..experience is the best teacher"
  #18  
Old 07/30/2007, 11:46 AM
capn_hylinur capn_hylinur is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 4,582
Quote:
Originally posted by Nanz
Thanks everyone..

My Calcium additive does have Mg in it but it seems to be not enough. I guess I thought it would rise when Ca was added, hehe. My pH is not High in fact its low.. 7.9
Nanz, magnesium doesn't directly hurt coral---it is needed to help with the dissolving of calcium and bringing it up to higher levels.

It is the low calcium level that can inhibit growth of calcium
__________________
"evrr bean to sea Billy--evrr smelled a fish?" "Aye capn..experience is the best teacher"
  #19  
Old 07/30/2007, 12:12 PM
INCEPTION7 INCEPTION7 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 54
In my experience, I've always used buffers adding to my R/o water. Buffers, when used as directed, don't have that large of an affect on alkalinity. I run 2 calcium reactors (alkalinity reactors), add buffer to my top of water and have a reverse lighted fuge and have zero problems with PH, Alkalinty or Calcium. I think you just have to make sure you aren't reaching the top end of DKH while shooting for high calcium.
__________________
You can't recreate the ocean overnight.
  #20  
Old 07/30/2007, 01:28 PM
capn_hylinur capn_hylinur is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 4,582
Quote:
Originally posted by INCEPTION7
In my experience, I've always used buffers adding to my R/o water. Buffers, when used as directed, don't have that large of an affect on alkalinity. I run 2 calcium reactors (alkalinity reactors), add buffer to my top of water and have a reverse lighted fuge and have zero problems with PH, Alkalinty or Calcium. I think you just have to make sure you aren't reaching the top end of DKH while shooting for high calcium.
I was doing this with very similar equipment to yours except the calcium reactors--lucky dog I was trying to raise the pH using buffers but it was driving my pH up over the range (12-13 dKH)
so i was advised to switch to calcium hydroxide.

To avoid arguing lets agree that if you use buffers you should keep carefull watch of your alkalinity levels
__________________
"evrr bean to sea Billy--evrr smelled a fish?" "Aye capn..experience is the best teacher"
  #21  
Old 07/30/2007, 01:55 PM
marduc marduc is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tampa, Fl.
Posts: 682
Quote:
Originally posted by capn_hylinur
I make it a habit---correct if I am wrong--to add magnesium every time I add calcium ---I use both Seachem's powders--mix it up in a milk container and add to the sump
I have never come across any documented proof that a high magnesium level is damaging and experts right on this site say that it not part of the measurement of alkalinity test kits.
Once a decent magnesium (1250 - 1350 ish) level is attained, it does not have to be attended to that frequently (I check mine monthly, it requires correction perhaps every 4 - 6 months).. elevated magnesium may or may not be a bad thing, but referring back to the three legged stool analogy that sk8r gave.. constant mag additions over time will potentially make for a lopsided stool.

There is also a potential problem of the magnesium and the calcium reacting prematurely in your container before you add it to the water, they are both very similar structurally, and both highly reactive elements.. they should be dosed separately!

And, yes as far as the buffer usage.. they can be a double edged sword.. if you just use buffers to ameliorate ph problems, without a corresponding balanced calcium addition your alk/ca/mg balancing act will get skewed all out of proportion. Make sure to test for EVERYTHING dosed into your tank prior to dosing, DO NOT let ph be an indicator that buffer needs added.

Going back to the mg situation.. I use epsom salts (MgSO4) to tweak my levels, this will add a bit of sulfate to the tank, but with the infrequency of dosing after Mg levels are where they need to be, it is minimal. If using this to adjust Mg levels, I would take it slowly and gradually raise them over a week or two.

Once Mg is in check.. then Ca and Alk can be attended to. After everything is in line.. the key to maintaining this is BALANCED additions, whether it be limewater, store bought 2-part additives, DIY 2-parts, or calcium reactor.

I highly, highly recommend anyone who has not done so to visit the reef chemistry forum and reading the numerous articles in the sticky at the top of the forum relating to this topic.
  #22  
Old 07/30/2007, 07:21 PM
capn_hylinur capn_hylinur is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 4,582
great post thanks--especially point number two with mixing them together--wasn't aware of that
I can't say I have read everyone of Randy's articles but I am working at it
__________________
"evrr bean to sea Billy--evrr smelled a fish?" "Aye capn..experience is the best teacher"
  #23  
Old 07/31/2007, 12:26 AM
bertoni bertoni is offline
RC Mod
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Foster City, CA, USA
Posts: 35,743
Magnesium and calcium can be mixed without problems. That's how the commercial two-part work. I would worry mostly about getting the parameters out of balance with blind dosing of a mix.
__________________
Jonathan Bertoni
  #24  
Old 07/31/2007, 08:40 AM
capn_hylinur capn_hylinur is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 4,582
acutally I am having much better stability and dosing less since I have changed to water changes twice a month instead of one.
__________________
"evrr bean to sea Billy--evrr smelled a fish?" "Aye capn..experience is the best teacher"
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef Central™ Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2009