Reef Central Online Community

Home Forum Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences View New Posts View Today's Posts

Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Search Reefkeeping ...an online magazine for marine aquarists Support our sponsors and mention Reef Central

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community Archives > General Interest Forums > Lighting, Filtration & Other Equipment
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #176  
Old 05/27/2007, 01:27 PM
jacmyoung jacmyoung is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 1,357
From the pictures and the fact the fixture is light weight, I think the packaging is adequate.

I will however agree with Bean Animal on two things:

For the money people spend on it, the packaging can definitely be nicer. A high end product deserves a high end appearance.

And you definitely need a full time QC person trained in the US to have full control of QC issues at the Chinese manufacture. It can be done just not cheap. A good US trained professional in China earns as much as a US worker here.
  #177  
Old 05/27/2007, 03:21 PM
Mark426 Mark426 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Beaufort, SC
Posts: 353
Patrick,

My problem with the PFO light I received was that you knew it was sub-standard many months ago, as evidenced by a couple of YOUR earlier posts and you sold it anyway. As for your customer service, as pleasant as everyone was I spoke with, no effort was ever made to replace my light. I also never heard a single word from you or your company regarding my problem. (your company has my number). If you would have made even the smallest effort (also as as promised in YOUR posts) I would be one of your greatest allies and my problem would have gone un-noticed, unfortunately you have accomplished the exact opposite.

Last edited by Mark426; 05/27/2007 at 03:35 PM.
  #178  
Old 05/27/2007, 05:14 PM
BeanAnimal BeanAnimal is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 11,710
Patrick, UPS approved or not... the packaging looks like the bare minimum to meet the approval. From the numerous posts it would appear that a significant amount of nuisance damage has occurred during shipment. As I said, for the price, it would appear that there is plenty of room for improvement in many areas.

I can only go by the public posts on this subject.

Thank you for the kind response to my posts.
  #179  
Old 05/27/2007, 07:58 PM
PFO Lighting PFO Lighting is offline
RC Sponsor
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 269
Jacmyoung
"the packaging can definitely be nicer. A high end product deserves a high end appearance."

I am very open to suggestions on the outer box. The problem is that currently 95% of the Solaris are being shipped via UPS. UPS beats the crap out of the box. So whether the box looks nice to begin with or not, by the time the box ends up at the end customer it looks bad. Because the boxes can be up to 80" long a full color box becomes extremely expensive. If we put the Solaris in a full color box and then over wrap it with a bigger box than the UPS shipping costs get out of hand. I am definately open for suggestions.

"And you definitely need a full time QC person trained in the US to have full control of QC issues at the Chinese manufacture. It can be done just not cheap. A good US trained professional in China earns as much as a US worker here."

I have been looking for one for awhile. My wife would jump for joy because I wouldn't be making so many trips to china. (I leave again in two weeks.) The quality control is improving dramatically. We are starting the process of getting the factory to be ISO9000 certified. On our last shipment that we started shipping last week, so far all we have heard is that some people are not ventilating the H4 power supplies enough. All the loose screws, scratched lens, ect appear to have been solved.

Mark426, I have responded to your PM.

BeanAnimal, When I post on the newsgroups I try very hard to keep my responses to facts, preferably by an outside unbiased authority. However, I read the newsgroups consistantly. The newsgroup people tell me what I need to know about how to improve the product, what I am doing right, and what needs to change. Almost all of our products have been improved by comments from the newsgroups and/or our customers.

Thank you for your continued support on the Solaris LED light fixture.

Patrick Ormiston
PFO Lighting Inc.
sales@pfolighting.com
  #180  
Old 05/27/2007, 08:47 PM
spleen93 spleen93 is offline
grouchy hermit
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: somewhere at the end of the rainbow
Posts: 865
Pat - I'm one of your customers having bought the H4 and just having received it (like it very much, BTW). I would agree that the packaging could have been improved. I don't think that anybody here is requesting a full color box - but a thicker sturdier grade of cardboard would have been nice. I would disagree that boxing the fixture in an interior box, padding the outside of this and then placing within a shipping box would be cost prohibitive. Most people that are purchasing this fixture would probably prefer to get their fixture in a sturdy container that is better able to handle the rigors of shipment and wouldn't mind paying extra to ensure this (I was shocked as to how cheap the shipping estimate was when I ordered it - I would have paid double for the S&H if it meant that it was packed more securely).

Again, this is meant to be constructive criticism and be assured that I do like my fixture a lot! Best wishes in continued efforts to improve the product.

Spleen
  #181  
Old 05/27/2007, 10:06 PM
Amphibious Amphibious is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Fort Pierce, FL.
Posts: 202
Hey Pat,

Received my H4 on Friday, thank you. I'm very impressed with the new unit. It is very evident, to me, that improvements in fit and finish have been made, plus a new computer face. So far no issues with performance.

About the packaging. I was happy to see the 72" is now shipped in two boxes. The power sources in one and the fixture in another. My fixture box was literally falling apart. The bottom taped seam was ripped from one end to the other with the power cords exposed. The top of the box had foot prints toward one end and an obvious hole where the perpetrator's heel went through the cardboard. Fortunately the unit came through UPS's rough handling in fine shape. The driver stayed around to see if there was any damage. He admitted, in a joking manner, that another package survived their rough treatment.

I would make a couple of suggestions toward improved packaging that shouldn't be too cost prohibitive. First, use more of the foam blocking that supports the fixture in the box. Perhaps encapsulating the entire fixture. Second, more or stronger tape to seal the cardboard box. I was surprised to see that the tape, top and bottom, was split open nearly the complete length of the box.

The H4 operates flawlessly, is considerably brighter than the 250W (YES, I know we were expecting it to be) and it too operates without directing heat to the aquarium.

Thanks for all your effort Pat in bring out another great product.

Dick
__________________
Amphibious

If ignorance is BLISS, why are there so many miserable people in the world???
  #182  
Old 05/27/2007, 10:34 PM
PFO Lighting PFO Lighting is offline
RC Sponsor
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 269
What if we took the current box and slid that into another box. The outer box would open on the small end panels. This would cause the weak long top opening portion of the box to have strength by the outer box which would be solid around the body of the fixture? We would then make the inner box white with the PFO Aquatics logo on the sides?
  #183  
Old 05/27/2007, 10:45 PM
Amphibious Amphibious is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Fort Pierce, FL.
Posts: 202
That would be a big improvement and probably end the shipping damage.
__________________
Amphibious

If ignorance is BLISS, why are there so many miserable people in the world???
  #184  
Old 05/27/2007, 11:08 PM
palawan palawan is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Fremont,CA
Posts: 410
Do you get the same Metal Halide "shimmering effect" with the SOLARIS units?
  #185  
Old 05/27/2007, 11:17 PM
Amphibious Amphibious is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Fort Pierce, FL.
Posts: 202
Yes, you get shimmer effect with the Solaris. It is somewhat reduced from MHs but you can increase it by agitating the surface water. By directing water flow across and just under the surface, shimmer will be increased.
__________________
Amphibious

If ignorance is BLISS, why are there so many miserable people in the world???
  #186  
Old 05/28/2007, 12:02 AM
Gem Tang Rider Gem Tang Rider is offline
Big Boy Pants
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Raymond, Wisconsin "Behind the Cheddar Curtain"
Posts: 4,188
I would like to know how many watts a 6' H4 Solaris fixture draws. The Solaris website says 600watts of LED wattage. But how much extra do the rest of the controls use.

Does anyone have a $25 kill-a-watt meter, that they could give me a max wattage draw?
__________________
I've been told, I have skimmer envy.

Proud Member of the wisconsinreefsociety.org &
cmas.net
  #187  
Old 05/28/2007, 02:25 AM
BFG BFG is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 79
Been looking at this thread on some occasion. Here's my 2cts.

Patrick, from looking at the pics of LarryW posted on the condition of the box, I would suggest adding more of the foam block on the lightset. You may need a larger block supporting both end of the light set and a few more supporting the space between the 2 edge. Wider thicker block is better than a thin strip of foam. It will give support to the lightset as opposed to have hoping the box would.

Handling cargo is my job scope. Sometimes, the handler might placed the boxes on top of the other cargo but other times the boxes might be located at the bottom of the pile. When that happen, the more support the package has, the lesser chance it will be damaged in transit. I do occasionally come across packages that I considered flimsy packed and sometimes wondered why the person/company packaged their product in that kind of material. Usually when it arrived in my hand, I sometimes have to tape up certain area of the box as it will have already have damaged because of the item inside it. Either it is too heavy for the box or that it is even too full to be packed in. So in any case, a well supported item in a box will make a difference.

In this case, the lightset should have a soft plastic covering it to prevent water from touching the set. The plastic could be tied at the opening to enclose the lightset. You'll never know in what condition the box have to go through to get to the new owner. The foam block should be added after the lightset is enclosed in the plastic cover. As for the box, you do not need a full box of colour, just add your company logo should be enough. But for transportation wise, it is better to paste a couple of 'FRAGILE' sticker of both side of the box. Also a couple of orientation sticker eg 'THIS WAY UP' sticker or the double arrow pointing up sticker should be included and pasted on the box. It could be printed on the box in the 1st place to save some labour cost to apply the sticker onto the box. There are other handling sticker such as the 'HANDLE AS GLASS' too. You might want to get those too if you really need it.

I have seen your product for the 1st time a couple of days ago. It's great that your company comes up with these alternative lighting equipment. I would get it if I can afford one. Hope you'll find my contribution in this thread helpful in the course to provide excellent customer support.
__________________
If you've learnt, teach.
If you have, give.
  #188  
Old 05/28/2007, 05:32 AM
spleen93 spleen93 is offline
grouchy hermit
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: somewhere at the end of the rainbow
Posts: 865
Quote:
Originally posted by Amphibious
That would be a big improvement and probably end the shipping damage.
I would agree. But suggestions to increase the foam blocks inside the inner box to better support the fixture are also good.

I was pleasantly surprised as to how much shimmer I'm getting. Very similar to my old MHs.

Spleen
  #189  
Old 05/28/2007, 02:39 PM
Gobie74 Gobie74 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: South Windsor, CT
Posts: 336
Could someone tell me how tall the Solaris units are including the mounting legs? I have 7 1/4" inside my canopy at the moment. Would I have to modify the canopy to fit a Solaris inside?
__________________
How much deeper would the ocean be without sponges?
  #190  
Old 05/28/2007, 03:08 PM
spleen93 spleen93 is offline
grouchy hermit
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: somewhere at the end of the rainbow
Posts: 865
7 inches from the rim of the tank to the top of the fixture using the mounting legs. I'd be worried about overheating with such limited airspace in your canopy. My fixture runs consistently between 90 - 95 degrees when all the lights are on with an open top tank.

Spleen
  #191  
Old 05/28/2007, 04:05 PM
Gobie74 Gobie74 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: South Windsor, CT
Posts: 336
Aren't the fan inlets / outlets located on the sides? I don't mind cutting holes on the sides for airflow.
__________________
How much deeper would the ocean be without sponges?
  #192  
Old 05/28/2007, 04:12 PM
spleen93 spleen93 is offline
grouchy hermit
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: somewhere at the end of the rainbow
Posts: 865
Yes, they are. If you position the holes correctly, it'll probably work.

Spleen
  #193  
Old 05/28/2007, 04:18 PM
Amphibious Amphibious is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Fort Pierce, FL.
Posts: 202
Yes, you can cut vent holes in the ends of your canopy to accomodate the Solaris venting feature. It's important to size your holes as large or larger than the Solaris fans and be sure they line up together.
__________________
Amphibious

If ignorance is BLISS, why are there so many miserable people in the world???
  #194  
Old 05/28/2007, 06:39 PM
Joe Joe is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Amish Country, PA. USA
Posts: 362
The packaging shpuld be MINIMUM 44 ECT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  #195  
Old 05/28/2007, 06:40 PM
Joe Joe is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Amish Country, PA. USA
Posts: 362
The packaging should be MINIMUM 44 ECT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Joe
  #196  
Old 05/29/2007, 11:15 AM
LarryW LarryW is offline
Just call me LDogg
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 1,513
ok, I am going to chime in here on the packaging.....

I was concerned about the hole in the side at first, but the ends of the unit were encased in those foam blocks, and it didn't really have a chance to move around. The unit was about 5" into each block, and I had to pull everything out to remove the foam. Yes a thicker box might have been better, but as long as the unit wasn't damaged, then I could care less. It's a freaking box for god sakes. Let's not get away from the fact that the 400w unit is now shipping, and looks freaking awesome.
__________________
Click on the Red House for my 120g Tech Series Build. Yes it's updated with pics.
  #197  
Old 05/29/2007, 11:34 AM
Zoom Zoom is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: SNJ
Posts: 5,471
Quote:
Originally posted by LarryW
ok, I am going to chime in here on the packaging.....

I was concerned about the hole in the side at first, but the ends of the unit were encased in those foam blocks, and it didn't really have a chance to move around. The unit was about 5" into each block, and I had to pull everything out to remove the foam. Yes a thicker box might have been better, but as long as the unit wasn't damaged, then I could care less. It's a freaking box for god sakes. Let's not get away from the fact that the 400w unit is now shipping, and looks freaking awesome.

Good thing the unit was not damaged you will not be so happy today
They need to use a better box ( stronger ) it may cost more for a shipping but if i pay two or three grand for a light what is $200 for shipping ? nothing if i get the light in one piece.
__________________
Steve .
  #198  
Old 05/29/2007, 11:40 AM
LarryW LarryW is offline
Just call me LDogg
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 1,513
I agree, that a thicker box or a double box would be better, and it appears PFO will resolve the issue on future shipments.
__________________
Click on the Red House for my 120g Tech Series Build. Yes it's updated with pics.
  #199  
Old 05/29/2007, 11:44 AM
Zoom Zoom is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: SNJ
Posts: 5,471
Quote:
Originally posted by LarryW
I agree, that a thicker box or a double box would be better, and it appears PFO will resolve the issue on future shipments.
I'm sure of that .
Hey..... you need to get your tank going what is the hold up?
__________________
Steve .
  #200  
Old 05/29/2007, 11:53 AM
LarryW LarryW is offline
Just call me LDogg
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 1,513
lot's of stuff.... well I am actually pretty close, I just need to get my powerheads, and return pump, and plumb the system. Then I need some base rock, and I can setup my structures, and then add sand, fill and order LR. I am actually looking at around september when it will be up.
__________________
Click on the Red House for my 120g Tech Series Build. Yes it's updated with pics.
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef Central™ Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2009