Reef Central Online Community

Home Forum Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences View New Posts View Today's Posts

Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Search Reefkeeping ...an online magazine for marine aquarists Support our sponsors and mention Reef Central

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community Archives > General Interest Forums > Reef Discussion

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06/12/2002, 05:16 PM
victorology victorology is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lava Rock, USA
Posts: 149
400 watt radium too much for 40 gallon high?

i have a 40 gallon high (36 x 13 x 20) with a 4" dsb... i love the radium look and am looking into getting a single 400 watt hqi with spider light reflector for the tank... i figure i'll have a 10" high hood... i'm just wondering if this is too much light for the tank...

i'm a beginner and don't plan on doing sps for a while but this is definitely in my plans for the future... i plan on adding a leather and a mushroom soon and would they not like the amount of light? thanks
  #2  
Old 06/12/2002, 05:41 PM
yrureefing yrureefing is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 658
I'm thinking of making the same size tank and the same lighting. I don't think it is to much light. What ballast are you going to use?
  #3  
Old 06/12/2002, 05:51 PM
big_dilli big_dilli is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sugarland, TX
Posts: 117
I think your heading in the too much light direction. The PAR of that is going to be way to much. From all of the research and info I have collected and read to much light can be as bad as to little light. Studies have shown higher mortality rates, increased bleaching, less growth, and other problems for corals directly attributed to to much lighting.
You have to remember they only receive the max amount of light that the sun can provide for just a few hours a day. The rest of the time the light comes in at an angle and isn't nearly as bright. Because the majority of the time the sun light isn't being received directly (as in straight overhead) they have adapted to this and this time is when their zooxanthalae are most active. This comes is basically paraphrased from Eric Borneman's Aquarium Corals book. I'd recommend a copy if you don't have one yet.

JMO
Brandon
  #4  
Old 06/12/2002, 05:56 PM
eddie eddie is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Southeastern NC
Posts: 1,897
i have a 1000watt 20k on a 135
imo and from reading
i definantly would go with the 400watt or youll wish you did later
get the 400watt electronic ballast
__________________
eddie
  #5  
Old 06/12/2002, 05:57 PM
victorology victorology is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Lava Rock, USA
Posts: 149
i was planning on going with the pfo hqi ballast... any other opinions? thanks
  #6  
Old 06/12/2002, 05:58 PM
john f john f is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Gainesville, Fl USA
Posts: 989
I have to disagree with Brandon here.

Higher light corals reach saturation at around 23000 lux. But the really shallow water corals live at light levels exceeding 50000 lux for a large part of the day.
A radium 20000K 400 watt bulb achieves about 50000 lux 6 inches below the bulb (basically at the water surface)
At 6 inches below the water the light will have dropped to about 20000 lux. This is good for most of the shallow water sps and the others will be kept a few inches lower or more.



John
__________________
"The state is the great fiction by which everybody tries to live at the expense of everybody else."

Frederick Bastiat
  #7  
Old 06/12/2002, 06:02 PM
yrureefing yrureefing is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 658
Are the spider light reflectors perpindicular or parallel reflectors. Also, would a 36in long tank get full coverage.
  #8  
Old 06/12/2002, 06:09 PM
big_dilli big_dilli is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sugarland, TX
Posts: 117
i'm a beginner and don't plan on doing sps for a while but this is definitely in my plans for the future... i plan on adding a leather and a mushroom soon and would they not like the amount of light?

This is the part of the message I'm looking at. Do you think he can keep leathers and shrooms in that tank? Maybe, maybe not. Your tank your decision. I'm just giving my opinion. And in that opinion there are better ways to light a 40 then with one 400w light for what your planning on doing.

JMO
Brandon
  #9  
Old 06/12/2002, 07:07 PM
kevinpo kevinpo is offline
Team RC Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Spokane Valley WA
Posts: 3,740
I use a 400W Ushio (it is more intense than a Radium) and have mushrooms and star polyps that both do OK. You may need to acclimate your soft corals for a few weeks and keep them from directly under the bulb. If you can put the bulb 10-12" above the water this will increase the light spread = less intensity in a given area. This will save you money in the long run when you add SPS corals. I am currently testing a 400W Radium bulb and it appears to me to be useable (blue enough for my tastes) without adding actinics which could also save money.

Regards,
Kevin
__________________
SPS Guy
I owe I owe so off to frag I go. On - On
  #10  
Old 06/12/2002, 07:10 PM
tentacle tentacle is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA
Posts: 1,299
Quote:
Originally posted by yrureefing
Are the spider light reflectors perpindicular or parallel reflectors. Also, would a 36in long tank get full coverage.
yrureefing they can be mounted either way. I think you might get decent coverage if you only use 1 bulb and reflector. But I think you'll end up with less intense, shadier areas at the bottom outer areas of the tank. This may or may not be desired depending on what type of corals you decide to keep. But it really depends on tank depth, and what type of bulb and ballast are used.
__________________
Frank Mariani
  #11  
Old 06/12/2002, 07:14 PM
yrureefing yrureefing is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 658
I am thinking about a 400 watt 20k radium on a hqi ballast. As of height I am thinking about 18 or 20 inches.
  #12  
Old 06/12/2002, 07:19 PM
Project Reef Project Reef is offline
_________________________
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 4,805
Get the 400 radium my man.
__________________
- Ali
  #13  
Old 06/12/2002, 07:24 PM
yrureefing yrureefing is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 658
What is the difference between the hqi or the blueline E ballast running a radium.
  #14  
Old 06/12/2002, 07:43 PM
john f john f is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Gainesville, Fl USA
Posts: 989
They both put out about the same light.
The e-ballast probably controls the bulb burn closer to specs. The PFO HQI is really not the proper ballast for Radium bulbs. It drives them at 430 watts for example. Bulb life MAY be longer with the e-ballast although I have no confirmation on this.

The proper ballast for a 400 watt Radium may turn out to be a HPS ballast.
Perryinca is working on that as we speak.



John
__________________
"The state is the great fiction by which everybody tries to live at the expense of everybody else."

Frederick Bastiat
  #15  
Old 06/12/2002, 07:49 PM
yrureefing yrureefing is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 658
Do they put out different color spectrums.
  #16  
Old 06/12/2002, 07:57 PM
eddie eddie is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Southeastern NC
Posts: 1,897
john anymore info on the 1000watt hqi ballast yet
__________________
eddie
  #17  
Old 06/12/2002, 09:10 PM
john f john f is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Gainesville, Fl USA
Posts: 989
I'll be calling Perry at Tridonic Tomorrow.



John
__________________
"The state is the great fiction by which everybody tries to live at the expense of everybody else."

Frederick Bastiat
  #18  
Old 06/13/2002, 03:01 PM
john f john f is offline
Premium Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Gainesville, Fl USA
Posts: 989
Eddie,

I spoke to Steve Purdy from Tridonic today. He is emailing Europe today and we should know exact price and availability by Monday.



John
__________________
"The state is the great fiction by which everybody tries to live at the expense of everybody else."

Frederick Bastiat
  #19  
Old 06/13/2002, 03:38 PM
JasonD JasonD is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: San Diego
Posts: 392
Have used the 400 watt and 250 watt Radiums, love them both. Would probably recommend the 400 watt version over the 250 watt version, just more power.


Jason
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef Central™ Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2009