Reef Central Online Community

Home Forum Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences View New Posts View Today's Posts

Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Search Reefkeeping ...an online magazine for marine aquarists Support our sponsors and mention Reef Central

Go Back   Reef Central Online Community Archives > General Interest Forums > The Reef Chemistry Forum
FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10/23/2007, 11:48 PM
REEFY1 REEFY1 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: vinton virginia
Posts: 213
Seachem Phosguard

is this bad to use in a reef aquarium with SPS, i need a PO4 remover my test kit salifert says 0 but i have some hair algae so i know their are phosphates- HELP !!!
  #2  
Old 10/24/2007, 01:19 AM
demonsp demonsp is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: el paso tx
Posts: 3,651
Whats the water source like if i need to ask .
__________________
Lance H.
  #3  
Old 10/24/2007, 07:38 AM
Percula9 Percula9 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: orange county CA
Posts: 1,396
Nitrates also can fuel algal problems.
  #4  
Old 10/24/2007, 11:01 AM
The0wn4g3 The0wn4g3 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hoover, AL
Posts: 263
No, I've been running SeaChem's Phogaurd in my mixed tank (only 4 SPS) for months. It does a very good job when used in a reactor, and a decent job when not. PO4 seems to be dead 0 ever since I bought the reactor.
__________________
The 0ne. The 0nly. The0wn4g3
  #5  
Old 10/24/2007, 12:17 PM
bertoni bertoni is offline
RC Mod
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Foster City, CA, USA
Posts: 35,743
I wouldn't use PhosGuard in a reef tank:

http://www.advancedaquarist.com/issu...y2003/chem.htm

The GFO products, like the Warner and PhosBan, seem to work better, anyway.
__________________
Jonathan Bertoni
  #6  
Old 10/24/2007, 05:20 PM
The0wn4g3 The0wn4g3 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hoover, AL
Posts: 263
I'm not so great when it comes to chemistry, no doubt about that... but after reading that article (thanks for the info btw, did not know that) it states:

"Table 4 summarizes the results for a serious of samples in which commercial Phosguard (75 mL) was placed into contact with aquarium water or freshly made Instant Ocean artificial seawater (500 mL)."

75mL in 500mL of IO is a ridiculously large amount for such a small amount of water. The instruction on the PhosGaurd is 250mL per 75-100gal. If my conversions are correct, 1 US gal = 3,785mL.
At maximum dosage that's 250mL per 283,875mL of saltwater, or 0.24L to 283L.
I would think this MUCH larger dilution would reduce the ppm count to a very, very small amount.
Am I totally wrong?

I have used Rowaphos, Phosban, and Phosguard, and have seen no real difference in the way they remove or effect reef tanks. I use PhosGuard simply because it is so much cheaper for the same performance.

Thanks.
__________________
The 0ne. The 0nly. The0wn4g3
  #7  
Old 10/24/2007, 05:27 PM
bertoni bertoni is offline
RC Mod
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Foster City, CA, USA
Posts: 35,743
The total amount amount of PhosGuard in the system would be far smaller than in the article, and the aluminum would go down proportionately, but aluminum can be toxic in very small doses. The article was written because many people were reporting problems using PhosGuard.

The point of the experiment was to determine if the media might leach aluminum, not to simulate a tank.
__________________
Jonathan Bertoni
  #8  
Old 10/24/2007, 05:48 PM
The0wn4g3 The0wn4g3 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hoover, AL
Posts: 263
I realize the point of the experiment, but according to that article feeding with brine shrimp releases much more aluminum than PhosGuard ever could.
I have personally seen 3 mature mixed reef tanks on the verge of totally crash due to the use of ROWAphos.

What I'm saying is I don't believe it's fair to throw up a link and recommend not using Phosguard. The moajority of people won't even read the article. All products have their disadvantages, and when it comes to either having minute amounts of aluminum or high PO4, personally I'm going with the minute amounts of aluminum.

PS: Props on that quick reply, that's amazing! haha
__________________
The 0ne. The 0nly. The0wn4g3
  #9  
Old 10/24/2007, 05:57 PM
bertoni bertoni is offline
RC Mod
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Foster City, CA, USA
Posts: 35,743
The article doesn't say that brine shrimp will raise the aluminum level in the water column more than PhosGuard. That data isn't available. Also, the form of the aluminum in brine shrimp is unknown, so its toxicity cannot be evaluated. The form in PhosGuard is particulate.

Any PO4 remover can crash a tank, from what I can tell. I just don't see the point of taking the additional risk when using PhosGuard.
__________________
Jonathan Bertoni
  #10  
Old 10/24/2007, 06:41 PM
The0wn4g3 The0wn4g3 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hoover, AL
Posts: 263
"If you fed 5 grams of it to a 100 gallon tank every day, that would amount to 5 g x 120 mg/kg = 0.6 mg/day or 219 mg/year. Added to that 100 gallons (379 L), that gives an addition of 219 mg/378 L/y = 0.6 ppm per year. "

If we are worried about a tiny amount of particulate aluminum leached from Phosguard, i believe it's safe to say we should also be worried about 0.6ppm of unknown aluminum from brine shrimp.

Quote:
Originally posted by bertoni
Any PO4 remover can crash a tank, from what I can tell. I just don't see the point of taking the additional risk when using PhosGuard.
Perhaps if that had been stated in the original post it would not have sounded like you were shooting down a product and promoting others that are relatively just as risky.

What do you depend on, if anything, to remove the PO4 from your tank?
__________________
The 0ne. The 0nly. The0wn4g3
  #11  
Old 10/24/2007, 06:50 PM
bertoni bertoni is offline
RC Mod
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Foster City, CA, USA
Posts: 35,743
I read that quote. In no way does it state that the aluminum ends up in the water column. The article does caution about some possible danger from feeding brine shrimp.

I use GFO products because I think they're likely safer. Aluminum is known to be toxic at very low levels. Iron isn't.
__________________
Jonathan Bertoni
  #12  
Old 10/24/2007, 07:24 PM
The0wn4g3 The0wn4g3 is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hoover, AL
Posts: 263
"...the exact nature of the aluminum in these tests may well be different than in the toxicity tests reported above. That is, the nature may be particulate vs. colloidal vs. soluble vs. complexed by organics, etc."

I believe that means the same for the Phosguard as it does for the brine shrimp.

To each his own I suppose. Thanks for the information and clarification on all of my questions/comments.
__________________
The 0ne. The 0nly. The0wn4g3
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Use of this web site is subject to the terms and conditions described in the user agreement.
Reef Central™ Reef Central, LLC. Copyright ©1999-2009