|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
New Manifold needs some direction.(PICS)
After doing much research I have built a manifold. However the pump and strainer have become a problem.
This is a pic of my 58gal reef I am currently constructing the canopy to house the T5 lights so here is the manifold in its current state The ends of the 6 inputs in the will have locline flare nozzles. The pump I am looking at is the Gen-x 30 (about 900gph at 0 head) will be housed in the stand. After doing a lot of research I am worried that the manifold will not work that well without a higher powered pump. If I go with a 1000gph or higher pump I might have sand blowing all over the tank. Also I wanted to use this strainer because it doesn't look ugly but I am worried about it not sucking enough water for the pump. http://www.marinedepot.com/aquarium_...omflo.asp#tube If anyone can point me in the right direction I would be greatful. I am close to just getting 2 sea swirls and giving up. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
With 6 outlets on your manifold there will not be much flow from each one. Even at 900 GPH there would only be 150 GPH through each outlet. Not very much flow or velocity to create water movement even through what looks like 1/2 pipe. I would suggest a higher flow pump.
Is the Gen-x going to be on a closed loop?
__________________
Chuck Norris can divide by 0 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
I would go with a much bigger pump, say around 1200 gph. With 6 outlets that's only going to give you 200 gph on each one and that shouldn't blow your sand around.
If this is going to be for a closed loop I'm not sure the strainer you posted will be able to keep up with your pump. I think you would be better off with some PVC and a lot of holes drilled in it. By the way, your manifold looks great. Keep up the good work. Anthony would be so proud.
__________________
Jim Bald Guys never have a bad hair day. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
yes it will be on a closed loop. I could go with the genx 4(1200gph) but I am worried about the sand blowing all over the tank.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
It's always cheeper to go a little over size and turn it down than it is to undersize the pump and have to replace it in a few months.
__________________
Jim Bald Guys never have a bad hair day. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
JVHam,
Breadman is correct. I would bet Anthony would tell you to put a mag36 sized pump on this with a few more outlets. My manifold has 6 outlets with a mag12 and it does not blow sand around.
__________________
Chuck Norris can divide by 0 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
WHat do you use for the intake? I could use the strainer above but it is only 3/4in and I am worried about the pump cavitating.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I use 1" PVC with LOTS of holes drilled in it. The end is capped to keep and wandering animals out of the pump. Having lots of holes in the pipe keeps the suction lower on each hole so that snails or others don't stuck to the intake.
Take a look at the intake on the closed loop from Melvs site: http://www.melevsreef.com/closedloop.html
__________________
Jim Bald Guys never have a bad hair day. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I mean no offense by this but the closed loop on melevs site is not exactly nice looking. The idea behind the manifold is to get the plumbing out of the tank not add more to it. Anyways, I found this http://www.marinedepot.com/md_viewIt...8652&ast=&key=
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
It seems to look a lot better than pvc in this tank
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I think on my next tank I'm going to get it drilled for the closed loop.
__________________
Jim Bald Guys never have a bad hair day. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
I came up with a new idea last night. I once saw someone who put thier closed loop strainer in their internal overflow and it went over the back. What if I put the intake on the bottom of my overflow. I might take to much water but it might be successful? Anyone try this?
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
I was just wondering the same thing jvham...anyone tried this before? I was even thinking of just getting another overflow, dedicated strictlyto the closed loop pump??Thanks
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Well, I gave up on the manifold. I just ordered a sea swirl and 2 maxi jet 1200's giving me 1200gph of flow. It ended up being the same price as the colsed loop. I like the manifole for large tanks but I am not sure that it was practical for me. I will post a pick of the tank once everything arrives.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
If you have a large return volume, and you place the CL intake in the overflow your overflow might not be able to keep up... (and if your return pimp fails you loose 2 pumps) I did something a little different...
I have a glass tank and my overflow is plastic... there is glass on the inside that only comes up 3/4 the way.. I drilled my CL intakes (2x 1 1/2") in the plastic above the glass and hid my plumbing inside the overflow box.. I put strainers on the intakes.. so all that I see is 2 strainers sticking out of my overflow box...
__________________
Nerds with Guns? Fish with Guns! Kimber 1911-Dosen't get any better "If you don't test for it, DON'T ADD IT!!!!" "Always strive for the optimum environment, not the minimum environment" -BrianD- |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Mike Reefcentral Folding@Home team 37251 - Click my little red house to learn more and help medical science! |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
No. I gave you feedback on one set-up (for you or anyone else following along) but I figured I'd make it clear that I know you decided to go with another set-up. Sorry for the confusion.
I haven't used either this type of manifold or sea swirls, so I can't really comment on either. I'm shure you have put some thought into your decision. Happy reefing.
__________________
Mike Reefcentral Folding@Home team 37251 - Click my little red house to learn more and help medical science! |
|
|