Sure, but I'll need a few days to dig them up.
As for studies about people who read peer-reviewed vs. not ... I don't know of a study.
But if you haven't read the scientific literature you claim is bunk, how do you claim it's bunk?
[don't tell me some pundit told you to think that, unless you want me quoting the Sierra Club and other opposing pundits .... my take is that we need to get away from advocacy/pundits when discussing SCIENCE, as advocacy/pundits only matter when it's all opinion IMO]
__________________
read a lot, think for yourself
|